Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT 2021 Recommended Positions on Bills <br /> Assembly Bill/ Summary Guiding Recommended City Position TVC League of <br /> Senate Bill Principle Position CA Cities <br /> Position <br /> SB 10 (Wiener) Would, notwithstanding any local Housing Oppose. The bill provides an None Watch <br /> Planning and restrictions on adopting zoning additional tool for cities to facilitate <br /> zoning: housing ordinances, authorize a local zoning changes to provide sites <br /> development: government to pass an ordinance for housing, but does not mandate <br /> density to zone any parcel for up to 10 such zoning changes, thereby <br /> units of residential density per maintaining local control. <br /> parcel, at a height specified in the <br /> ordinance, if the parcel is located This is a reintroduction from a bill <br /> in a transit-rich area, a jobs-rich last year that include a provision <br /> area, or an urban infill site, as that would allow the City Council <br /> those terms are defined. In this to overturn a voter approved <br /> regard, the bill would require the initiative to use the provisions of <br /> Department of Housing and this bill. Although it is not reflected <br /> Community Development, in in the current bill language it is of <br /> consultation with the Office of concern. <br /> Planning and Research, to <br /> determine jobs-rich areas and <br /> publish a map of those areas <br /> every 5 years, commencing <br /> January 1, 2022, based on <br /> specified criteria. The bill would <br /> specify that an ordinance <br /> adopted under these provisions is <br /> not a project for purposes of the <br /> California Environmental Quality <br /> Act. The bill would prohibit a <br /> residential or mixed-use <br /> residential project consisting of <br /> 10 or more units that is located j RAF7T <br /> on a parcel rezoned pursuant to <br /> these provisions from being <br /> approved ministerially or by right. <br /> 6 <br /> February 5.2021 <br />