My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN12152020
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
CCMIN12152020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2021 3:25:20 PM
Creation date
2/3/2021 3:24:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
density and minimal traffic generation). She noted the project proposes a 99.7% FAR. She added there <br /> will be no more than three employees on-site at any time for low density and the Traffic Engineering <br /> Division concurred with Public Storage's study predicting low traffic generation. <br /> Associate Planner Campbell listed proposed project amenities, including $300,000 to the City to <br /> construct a public trail on the south side of Nevada St. and five years of maintenance funds ($14,000), <br /> and a public seating area on Nevada St. valued at about $6,000. She stated Public Storage will follow <br /> enhanced green building measures above code requirements by putting solar panels on the roof and <br /> meeting the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) silver rating standards. She <br /> added the trail would be part of the Arroyo Del Valle Trail which was identified as the highest priority <br /> trail in the 2019 Master Plan in addition to being complex and expensive. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum's inquiries, Director of Community Development Clark clarified <br /> the upgrades to the site including the robust landscaping and improvements to the exterior of the <br /> buildings are hard to set a value upon. She stated they can be considered an amenity monetarily to the <br /> city but are not above what the City would consider for any high-quality project. She added the <br /> easement had been dedicated for many years before this project came forth thus not making it an <br /> amenity. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum's inquiry, City Manager Fialho clarified while there is an inherent <br /> value to the new landscaping and architecture, there isn't a monetary one. He added there is a value to <br /> the cooperation of the property owner to allow the easement without contesting it, but the City cannot <br /> put a dollar value on it to add to the amenity list. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa's inquiry, Associate Planner Campbell noted there is landscaping <br /> around the new one-story storage building which abuts the houses at Irby Ranch and will serve as a <br /> buffer. Director of Community Development Clark clarified there is no landscaping planned around the <br /> existing buildings because open spaces are needed for vehicular circulation on the property. She <br /> added landscaping planted by Irby Ranch will also provide screening in the future as it matures. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown's inquiries, Associate Planner Campbell stated the applicant can respond <br /> later in the meeting if the trees have been switched from the deciduous in the rendering to evergreens. <br /> She clarified the solar panels would be behind a parapet and out of the residents' line of sight. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, Associate Planner Campbell stated the applicant had been <br /> willing to switch to a flat roof from a pitched one as evidenced by the December 8th update. She stated <br /> the applicant would have to clarify if it changes the parapet. <br /> In response to Councilmember Arkin's inquiry, Associate Planner Campbell clarified that while solar <br /> panels do reduce operating costs to Public Storage, it is considered an amenity by the City because it <br /> reduces the greenhouse gas emissions which is a goal of the City's Climate Action Plan (CAP). She <br /> added Public Storage would not currently be required to take this step by code. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa's inquiry, Director of Community Development Clark stated they <br /> treated the solar panels as a "wash" because it is built into the construction cost so there is no dollar <br /> figure attached to the amenity listing. <br /> Associate Planner Campbell continued her presentation by discussing the Planning Commission's <br /> request to assess the value of the increased FAR compared to the value of the amenities, reflecting <br /> project costs. She stated staff requested a review by Economic and Planning Systems (EPS) which <br /> confirmed the estimate is reasonable and in line with industry standards. She stated, based on the <br /> estimation, the increased FAR will yield approximately $338,500 in Residual Land Value which is <br /> comparable to the value of the amenities provided to the City. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 7 of 17 December 15, 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.