|
Online Survey Questions EXHIBIT B
<br /> Weblink: https://forms.gle/KLByuqqb2htKD8wQA
<br /> - I have no idea
<br /> 7B. Does the plaza adjacent to the crossing to the BART station provide an active and usable
<br /> space?
<br /> 7C. Which elements do you feel were most successful in this project? Provide an explanation or
<br /> brief notes if possible.
<br /> 7D. Which elements do you feel were least successful in this project? Provide an explanation or
<br /> brief notes if possible.
<br /> General Questions
<br /> 8A. Should sidewalks or pedestrian walkways provide dedicated pedestrian access to every
<br /> home in a development?
<br /> - Yes
<br /> - No
<br /> 8B. Should site plans be designed such that homes and residential entries face garages?
<br /> - All homes/residential entries should be required to face other entries, open spaces, or
<br /> streets
<br /> - All homes/residential entries should not be prohibited from facing garages
<br /> - No opinion
<br /> 8C. Based on the developments you toured, where should future applicants provide higher
<br /> quality design and materials? Please rank potential locations for higher quality design and
<br /> materials by high, medium, and low priority.
<br /> - Public street-facing elevations
<br /> - Elevations visible from public/internal streets
<br /> Elevations visible from walkways and open spaces
<br /> - Elevations visible from alleys, driveways, or parking lots
<br /> - Shared building entries
<br /> -- Individual unit entries
<br /> - Projecting elements (bays, porches, decks)
<br /> - Building rooflines
<br /> - Public street-facing elevations
<br /> - Elevations visible from public/internal streets
<br /> - Elevations visible from walkways and open spaces
<br /> - Elevations visible from alleys, driveways, or parking lots
<br /> - Shared building entries
<br /> - Individual unit entries
<br /> Projecting elements (bays, porches, decks)
<br /> - Building rooflines
<br /> 8D. Should future design standards include requirements to provide deep recesses on long
<br /> buildings to reduce perceived bulk?
<br /> - Recesses would be appropriate
<br /> - Recesses would not be appropriate
<br /> - No opinion
<br /> 4
<br />leys, and paseos of a subject project to connect not only internally but also to adjacent
<br /> streets and neighboring developments.
<br /> The potential revision to this language is, however, written also as a guideline (not a standard)
<br /> since connectivity to adjacent properties or neighboring developments may or may not feasible
<br /> on each project. Therefore, while quantifiable standards for residential development will be
<br /> incorporated into the objective standards, staff also expects that guidelines will also be
<br /> incorporated to reflect best practices and serve as design guidance for a project where it is not
<br /> possible or practical to establish a quantifiable objective standard.
<br /> Existing Housing DG:
<br /> Al.d Streets, alleys and paseos should not only connect internally but also be
<br /> publicly accessible and connect to adjacent streets and neighboring
<br /> development.
<br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission
<br /> 9 of 10
<br />Design Standards Planning Commission
<br /> 7 of 10
<br />al facade pattern.
<br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission
<br /> 6 of 10
<br /> design.
<br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission
<br /> 5 of 10
<br />ble for SB35 streamlining.
<br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission
<br /> 4 of 10
<br />e +� .�,� - `
<br /> Cio < °' cit 1 �,. t- ; t+ $.
<br /> 4000
<br /> park
<br /> t.
<br /> rr v m. ♦ k..a 'AY 4b 0f ; .t Zn 47R
<br /> w, 1� �s ,,,c,,,< 7?,T`➢ �' bs, is gds [^V I' J .7.no -
<br /> ..,e,iv+ y,-' >.io/ "� -.!4 �� •y rr `\-\ G, air L Jbz
<br /> '`i �! '� r !I '• \\`''' b'� t'i
<br /> �s < • 7 , ` P v gFtw� ' 4' `o, a • / ' iP °4. xov `yahj)ll
<br /> rErA'S-A4,7„..'r ® >3[RNAI ,(. qLlib �, A 5�,j
<br /> , c�I_I� BERN aL.
<br /> Ora a
<br /> 1:5.672
<br /> 0 0.05 0.1 „i P20-0987, Wells, CUP, 706 Main St
<br /> Planning Division _ a_, ,
<br /> , January 4,2021 I>r.
<br /> LE +j S. N
<br /> 0 355 710 Feet
<br />
|