Laserfiche WebLink
Online Survey Questions EXHIBIT B <br /> Weblink: https://forms.gle/KLByuqqb2htKD8wQA <br /> - I have no opinion <br /> 3B. What did you like best about this community? <br /> - the open space design <br /> - pedestrian circulation <br /> - the facade articulation and materials <br /> - landmark features and wayfinding <br /> - connection to surrounding neighborhoods or trails <br /> Other: <br /> 3C. Which elements do you feel were most successful in this project? Provide an explanation or <br /> brief notes if possible. <br /> 3D. Which elements do you feel were least successful and why? Provide an explanation or brief <br /> notes if possible. <br /> SITE #4 -Andares <br /> Approximately 15 unit/acre project on a Housing Element site providing 94 condominium units <br /> Google Street View - 5850 W Las Positas Blvd <br /> https://goo.gl/maps/XCjD8UV2kvcBS9CA6 <br /> 4A. Should functional elements intended for facade articulation also need to be usable? <br /> - I value aesthetics over practicality <br /> Open Space elements (porches, terraces, stoops) should be usable, but other elements <br /> such as sunshades and shutters need not be. <br /> - I value practicality over aesthetics <br /> 4B. Did you notice any utility equipment or air conditioners on site? <br /> - Utilities or equipment had an intrusive visual impact <br /> - Utilities were well-screened and did not create visual impact <br /> - I do not recall any utilities <br /> 4C. Which elements do you feel were most successful in this project? Provide an explanation or <br /> brief notes if possible. <br /> 4D. Which elements do you feel were least successful in this project? Provide an explanation or <br /> brief notes if possible. <br /> SITE #5 - The Mason Flats at Township Square <br /> Approximately 30 unit/acre development on a Housing Element site including 210 multifamily <br /> apartments; the density of the 97 detached townhomes is approximately 5 units/acre <br /> Google Street View - Brookline Loop <br /> https://goo.gl/maps/zwoubCY76b3YG9ff7 <br /> 2 <br />er homes face other homes <br /> 1 <br />e Format) <br /> In the following example related to site planning, the existing Housing DG encourage streets, <br /> alleys, and paseos of a subject project to connect not only internally but also to adjacent <br /> streets and neighboring developments. <br /> The potential revision to this language is, however, written also as a guideline (not a standard) <br /> since connectivity to adjacent properties or neighboring developments may or may not feasible <br /> on each project. Therefore, while quantifiable standards for residential development will be <br /> incorporated into the objective standards, staff also expects that guidelines will also be <br /> incorporated to reflect best practices and serve as design guidance for a project where it is not <br /> possible or practical to establish a quantifiable objective standard. <br /> Existing Housing DG: <br /> Al.d Streets, alleys and paseos should not only connect internally but also be <br /> publicly accessible and connect to adjacent streets and neighboring <br /> development. <br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br /> 9 of 10 <br />Design Standards Planning Commission <br /> 7 of 10 <br />al facade pattern. <br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 10 <br /> design. <br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br /> 5 of 10 <br />ble for SB35 streamlining. <br /> P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br /> 4 of 10 <br />e +� .�,� - ` <br /> Cio < °' cit 1 �,. t- ; t+ $. <br /> 4000 <br /> park <br /> t. <br /> rr v m. ♦ k..a 'AY 4b 0f ; .t Zn 47R <br /> w, 1� �s ,,,c,,,< 7?,T`➢ �' bs, is gds [^V I' J .7.no - <br /> ..,e,iv+ y,-' >.io/ "� -.!4 �� •y rr `\-\ G, air L Jbz <br /> '`i �! '� r !I '• \\`''' b'� t'i <br /> �s < • 7 , ` P v gFtw� ' 4' `o, a • / ' iP °4. xov `yahj)ll <br /> rErA'S-A4,7„..'r ® >3[RNAI ,(. qLlib �, A 5�,j <br /> , c�I_I� BERN aL. <br /> Ora a <br /> 1:5.672 <br /> 0 0.05 0.1 „i P20-0987, Wells, CUP, 706 Main St <br /> Planning Division _ a_, , <br /> , January 4,2021 I>r. <br /> LE +j S. N <br /> 0 355 710 Feet <br />