5 - Laserfiche WebLink

PROPOSED PROJECT The applicant is requesting approval of a bar (serving beer) that would operate from 11 a.m. to 10 p.m., Sunday through Thursday, and 11 a.m. to 12 a.m. on Friday and Saturday. The planned capacity is 44 persons, comprised of 39 patrons at any given time and five staff persons. The applicant proposes to develop the project in two phases: Phase 1 would include the operation of the bar as described, but not include any physical changes to the interior or exterior of the subject building; Phase 2 would include minor physical changes to the subject building comprised of an ADA ramp within the outside patio, two new bathrooms and a small food service preparation and in-house kitchen within the subject building. No timing was provided by the applicant regarding phasing. Limited food service, including snacks, small plates, and small meals, would be available during the operating hours either: (1) through partnered restaurants; and/or (2) within the bar which would have a small food service preparation and in-house kitchen (as part of planned Phase 2 improvements) that would supplement and/or supplant the food service provided from partnered restaurants. Live amplified and non-amplified entertainment and music would occur daily inside until 11 p.m. and outside until 9 p.m. All indoor entertainment and music would occur within the main room and all outside entertainment and music would occur within the side patio area as shown on the floor plan (Figure 4). Figure 4 also illustrates the balance of the proposed interior tenant improvements at the completion of Phase 2 which include the bar and food service area, seating areas in the main room, side outdoor patio, a storage room, and restrooms. No exterior improvements are proposed at this time. Please see the attached narrative and project plans (Exhibit B) for additional information on the proposed use and related interior tenant improvements. Fi ure 4: Proposed floor plan —II .:, L7 6 , i I n .,,h I A w w 000 _ .. , c, 1 ii —r- :1•!; •� Sle_ IS rye . E 1- 4 " :f - ,-t---_J I . I r- I u4. ,. i \\\'`'N \\N , '..., N. Vis..N:SN N 'MS ,5 It: 1 Olt 1 Ct\ �, m 0 P. P. 2 P P20-0987, Gilman Brewing Company Planning Commission 4 of 8 i ,`ns 6.ti } C�rIR�-: �' , r‘i 'PA ;.y P20-0987, Gilman Brewing Company Planning Commission 2 of 8 ilar aesthetics to Pleasanton would be helpful as the Commissioners were constrained by their own experiences. Commissioner Brown stated he was looking forward to the tour. Chair Ritter stated he was not in favor of additional regulations but understood the need to comply with standards and remove subjectivity. He expressed his desire to establish effective and smooth processes. He stated he was an advocate of streamlining the zoning code and hoped the design standards would complement the code. Ms. Clark stated the City wanted to remove laborious, uncertain design review and the purpose of the exercise was to ensure the Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7 December 9, 2020 te quality development that fit the style and feel of Pleasanton. Commissioner Pace inquired if the standards being provided were real life examples relative to the standards that Mr. Williams had judged as successful or not, and whether the Commissioners were to review to see if they were aligned with the designation. Mr. Williams Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 7 December 9, 2020