_Minutes_December 9, 2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

CONSENT CALENDAR - Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received from the Planning Commission or a member of the public by submitting a speaker card for that item. 1. Actions of the City Council 2. Actions of the Zoning Administrator 3. P20-0817, Michelle Setchell for The Exercise Coach, 3958 Valley Avenue, Suite A — Application for Conditional Use Permit to operate a personal fitness studio. Zoning is PUD-I (Planned Unit Development — Industrial) District. 4. P20-0820 and P20-0821, Lucky's, 6155 W. Las Positas Boulevard —Applications for Design Review and Sign Design Review for: 1) exterior modifications to the existing Lucky's store which includes new facade, colors and a new outdoor dining area, 2) site modifications to existing landscaping and parking lot to accommodate the proposed outdoor dining area, and 3) new wall signage. Zoning is C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) District. Commissioner Allen moved to approve Items 1-3 on the Consent Calendar. Commissioner O'Connor seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Allen, Brown, O'Connor, Pace, and Ritter NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Commissioner Balch The Actions of the City Council were approved, as submitted. The Actions of the Zoning Administrator were approved, as submitted. Resolution PC-2020-15 approving Case P20-0817 was adopted, as motioned. Commissioner Pace moved to approve Item 4 on the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Allen seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Allen, Brown, O'Connor, Pace, and Ritter NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Commissioner Balch Resolution PC-2020-16 approving Cases P20-0820 and P20-0821 was adopted, as motioned. Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 7 December 9, 2020 pprove the application on the Consent Calendar, since the landscaping was a separate issue. Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 7 December 9, 2020 ey Larissa Seto informed the Commission that the Judge ruled in the City's favor, but the ruling was subject to a 60-day appeal period. Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 8 November 18, 2020 tory buildings but he liked the height. Chair Ritter stated he liked that the design removed the dumpsters currently at the entrance to the Stoneridge Mall area. He suggested waiting to determine setbacks until there were details on building height and location on the lot, adding that community benefit was more important to him. He suggested Building 1 be taller than Buildings 2 and 3 because it was further back and would give the campus more of a park feel. 4. Is the site plan, circulation, phasing approach and parking ratio acceptable? Commissioner Allen stated she would like to wait for Mr. Tassano's analysis on traffic circulation, but that she liked that it was coming from Springdale Avenue. She also expressed concern about the drop off on the Stoneridge Mall side. Commissioner O'Connor indicated support for the proposal but expressed similar concerns as Commissioner Allen regarding access from Springdale Avenue and echoed his desire to see the traffic analysis. Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 8 November 18, 2020 ic impact to the City when the usage of land was changed and whether staff considered that in its analysis. He stated he wanted to ensure the best use for the land was selected because, even though it Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8 November 18, 2020