My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Minutes_November 18, 2020
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
01-13
>
_Minutes_November 18, 2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2021 2:51:11 PM
Creation date
1/6/2021 2:51:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/13/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
if the alleged behavior had occurred recently, but the center had struggled for years and the <br /> project was a major lift as retail did not seem to thrive in the space. Commissioner O'Connor <br /> asked if the project made sense even though the City was adding more residential to the area <br /> and losing commercial at the mall. Mr. Luchini noted that retail was moving from brick and <br /> mortar to online and the City was trying to adjust. Community Development Director Ellen <br /> Clark stated there are advantages to having residential close to such a big employer, as well <br /> as retail next to residential. <br /> Commissioner Pace recalled a project that was brought before the Planning Commission <br /> earlier in the year that would redevelop a corner of the mall and include a gym, movie theater, <br /> a modification to the shopping experience, and some apartments. He asked if that project and <br /> the one currently before the Commission should be considered together or looked at entirely <br /> separately. Ms. Clark stated the two projects had been considered together and appeared to <br /> work well; and she discussed the importance of considering the totality of traffic. <br /> Chair Ritter asked if Workday was still interested in the plaza and Mr. Luchini stated they were <br /> no longer interested as their needs had shifted. <br /> Representing the Applicant, Brian Jencek, Senior Principal HOK San Francisco, gave a <br /> presentation on the proposed project. <br /> Commissioner Allen asked for clarification on the business model of 10x Genomics, <br /> particularly the sales tax revenue to the City. Mr. Jencek informed her the company made <br /> diagnostic equipment, which did not require large transport trucks. He explained the building <br /> itself would be used for Research and Development (R&D), as a lab, and as an office, which <br /> was more of a technology campus with many clean rooms. Mr. Jencek also stated he did not <br /> have information on sales tax generation, but he would investigate it and bring the information <br /> to a future Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Luchini explained 10x Genomics was more of <br /> an assembler than a manufacturer and they were a top ten sales tax producer for the City. He <br /> discussed the City's support of the company and growing life science center. Deputy City <br /> Manager Pamela Ott confirmed 10x Genomics was one of the City's top ten revenue <br /> generators but could not share specifics as it was confidential information for the company. <br /> She also explained biotech and life sciences were on the City Council's priority list. She stated, <br /> after auto dealerships and casual dining, biotech, life sciences, and medical were the third top <br /> sales producer in the City of Pleasanton and the project was an opportunity to look at what 10x <br /> Genomics meant to Pleasanton and what the City could do to retain the business in the City. <br /> Chair Ritter inquired whether 10x Genomics was planning on keeping its headquarters in the <br /> City of Pleasanton. Mr. Jencek confirmed that to be the case and that the company was <br /> interested in growing together with the City. <br /> Commissioner Allen asked if the company was planning on keeping all three locations in the <br /> City or if they would consolidate after the opening of the proposed campus. Mr. Jencek stated <br /> the idea was new net growth. <br /> Commissioner Pace asked for guidance on how to consider the economic impact to the City <br /> when the usage of land was changed and whether staff considered that in its analysis. He <br /> stated he wanted to ensure the best use for the land was selected because, even though it <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8 November 18, 2020 <br />