My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 0545
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
0501 - 0600
>
ORD 0545
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2014 3:51:13 PM
Creation date
10/19/1999 11:24:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 0545
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> �I ORDIPIANCE NO. 545 <br /> AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED <br /> TERRITORY, DESIGNATED AS ANNEXATION NO. 57 <br /> THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: <br /> I. <br /> The City Council does hereby make the following findings : <br /> (a) On December 9, 1968 , the City Council of the City of <br /> Pleasanton did pass and adopt Resolution No. 68-221 , giving noticd <br /> of the intention to annex certain uninhabited territory to the <br /> City of Pleasanton. Said territory was designated as Annex No. 5i <br /> and did describe the boundaries of the territories proposed to be <br /> annexed. <br /> (b) Said Resolution No. 68-221 contained notice of the time <br /> and place for the Council of the City of Pleasanton to hear pro- <br /> tests made:by any person owninn; real property within the territory <br /> proposed to be annexed. Said time of hearing was not less than <br /> fifteen nor more than sixty days from the date of passage of the <br /> 1 Resolution. <br /> (c) On 2u3ry 27,1969 , at the hour of 6: 00 P.M. , in the <br /> Jr_ <br /> ` Council chambers at the Multi-Purpose Room of Valley View School, <br /> ,1 480 Adams Court, in the City .of Pleasanton, County of Alameda, <br /> ij <br /> 1 State of California, the said City Council did conduct a public <br /> hearing and pass upon protests , there being none . By Resolution <br /> 4o. 69-15, the City Council determined that protests had not bee <br /> made by the owners of one-half of the value of the privately ovine• <br /> territory proposed to be annexed t.a shown by the last equalized <br /> {I f . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.