My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
121520
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2020 3:01:16 PM
Creation date
12/9/2020 1:54:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
Document Relationships
12 ATTACHMENT 1 EXHIBIT B
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\121520
12 ATTACHMENT 1-3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\121520
12 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\121520
12 ATTACHMENT 5-11
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\121520
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Figure 2: EPS Study Table of Assumed Density <br /> Table 10 <br /> Household Geawradon Rates by Employment Category <br /> Pleasanton Housing impact Fee,EP8 8181111 <br /> %of Wearies <br /> Sq,Ft.per Total WaANes Forming Total Households Households by Income Leval 141 <br /> Employment Worker(11 per 100k Sq.Ft. Households(2] per 100k Sq.Ft.(3,4( VII U-60 U-80 Median Moderate Above Mod <br /> HoteteJMptel 2.000 50 96 8% 29 0 18 6 2 t t <br /> Retail 440 227 899% 122 44 1 67 a 0 6 <br /> 481aMght lydustriabR&0 400 250 96 8% 145 1 1 8 65 9 63 <br /> (1)See Appendix Table A-1 for sources on employment densities m Menne land uses <br /> 1218L data indicates that 3 2%ol workers are ago 16.19 at the U S.however.the average a higher in the real and resWmarts Industry EPS assumes that 101% <br /> of workers are age 16-19 based on Ore National Retail Federation dale This age group is assumed to not term deer own households due to a young age <br /> (3(Aastauss 1 67 employees per household based on the Census data for Pleasanton <br /> (4)Figures are rounded to nearest whole member <br /> Sources 81$.National Retail Federation US Census end EPS <br /> In turn, these employee rates are used to develop estimates of how many households, <br /> and by extension, housing units, would be needed to house these new workers; and <br /> translated into a total cost to produce needed affordable housing units. <br /> PMC Affordable Housing Fee Reduction <br /> Section 17.40.050 of the PMC states that: <br /> "The City Council may reduce the Affordable housing fee if the project developer can <br /> demonstrate 1) That the proposed use will generate substantially fewer workers than <br /> the uses which have established the fee; and 2) That the building design is unable to <br /> house another use without substantial renovation. Examples of such uses are public <br /> utility facilities, exclusive storage buildings, etc." <br /> The purpose of these provisions is to recognize that some projects may generate lower- <br /> than-typical numbers of employees than those assumed in the calculation of fee rates. <br /> And, in the event a fee reduction is approved, that there is a minimal risk the facility can <br /> be converted into a different, more intensive use. <br /> Previous Fee Reduction Approvals <br /> The City has approved reductions of the Affordable Housing Fee for past storage <br /> projects. Staff identified two past examples (in 1997 and 2002) of Affordable Housing <br /> Fee reduction requests that were reviewed and approved by the City Council, as <br /> described below in Table 1. <br /> Page 11 of18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.