My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
120120
>
02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2020 3:23:19 PM
Creation date
11/23/2020 3:23:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/1/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Stewart reported the previous owner received approval for two agricultural lots on the southern <br /> portion of the property. Additionally, she explained the project is within the allowable density range and <br /> compliant with the average density use for holding capacity within the NSSP. She noted the City has <br /> already set precedence by approving increased density within the NSSP for two other developments. <br /> Ms. Stewart referenced Senate Bill (SB) 50 which encourages local governments to create policies that <br /> support the approval of housing. She explained approval could signal to state agencies that Pleasanton <br /> is willing to make reasonable adjustments to help alleviate the housing crisis. She noted the project is <br /> very well thought out and fits in well with the neighborhoods and makes the best use of the land. She <br /> encouraged City Council to pass the item. <br /> Margo Layton, Bringhurst family member, explained the family did not object when Greenbrier and <br /> Summerhill subdivisions were developed and made the current alignment of Sycamore Creek possible. <br /> She feels the project fits in with both the Sycamore Creek neighbors and the Sycamore Road <br /> neighborhoods. Additionally, she feels the City has asked for many more restrictions than those <br /> imposed on the neighbors. <br /> Mayor Thorne closed the public hearing. <br /> Councilmember Brown expressed her support for the project. <br /> Councilmember Narum thanked the staff for their recommendation but does feel this project warrants <br /> special conditions. She thanked the applicant for the creation of the trail and the utility easement. <br /> Councilmember Pentin expressed his support of the item. He also noted that while the project does not <br /> fit the NSSP guidelines, it does make sense for the neighborhood. <br /> Mayor Thorne expressed his support for the item and noted the NSSP was developed 28 years ago <br /> and the area has changed. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Brown/Narum to adopt and waive full reading of Resolution No. 20-1179 <br /> approving a Negative Declaration for the amendment to the North Sycamore Specific Plan (NSSP), <br /> rezoning, planned unit development (PUD) and subdivision of land for a five-lot residential development <br /> located at 990 Sycamore Road, as filed under Case Nos. PUD-135/P19-0031/P19-0032; Resolution <br /> No. 20-1180 approving an amendment to the North Sycamore Specific Plan (NSSP) for a proposed 5- <br /> lot residential development located at 990 Sycamore Road, as filed under Case No. P19-0031; <br /> Resolution No. 20-1181 approving a Growth Management Agreement with Alaina Stewart/Bringhurst <br /> LLC for the construction of four new single-family homes and related site improvements located at 990 <br /> Sycamore Road, as filed under Case No. PUD-135; and introduced and waived first reading of <br /> Ordinance No. 2210 approving applications for Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezoning and <br /> development plan and vesting tentative map for a five-lot residential project located at 990 Sycamore <br /> Road, as filed under Case Nos. PUD-135, P19-0030, and vesting tentative map 8528. Motion passed <br /> by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: Councilmember Testa <br /> Absent: None <br /> 17. Review and consider the City's legislative framework with the 2020 focus areas and establish the <br /> City's legislative positions on selected housing related bills and request City staff to monitor <br /> remaining legislation throughout the 2020 legislative cycle to determine whether the City Council <br /> should take a formal position - Continued from August 4 <br /> City Council Minutes Page 7 of 14 August 18, 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.