Laserfiche WebLink
"co-benefit" of resulting in cleaner water, than an alternative action that just reduces <br /> emissions. <br /> As such, before any actions are selected, a CAP 2.0 framework should be established <br /> about how to identify and prioritize potential actions. The Committee has provided <br /> direction on an overarching goal for the CAP 2.0 document (i.e., a vision), parameters <br /> for the actions selected (i.e., guiding principles), other priorities of the City (i.e., co- <br /> benefits), and criteria to help prioritize and narrow down the potential actions ultimately <br /> included in the CAP 2.0 (i.e., action selection criteria). <br /> Vision <br /> The vision will be in the introduction of the CAP 2.0 document. It describes what the City <br /> is trying to achieve with the CAP 2.0 and is intended to be the overarching goal for the <br /> document. The Committee recommended the following CAP 2.0 vision, to help guide <br /> the overall plan: <br /> This Climate Action Plan 2.0 looks to not only reduce Pleasanton's greenhouse <br /> gas emissions, but also improve quality of life and public health, cultivate <br /> community resilience and adaptability, and promote thriving ecosystems and a <br /> vibrant economy, now and for future generations. Through an inclusive and <br /> equitable process, the CAP 2.0 will position Pleasanton as a regional leader <br /> addressing climate change. <br /> Guiding Principles <br /> To help filter and guide the initial action list, the Committee recommended that selected <br /> actions must meet the following guiding principles: <br /> • Evidence-based I Select actions based on the best scientific and local <br /> knowledge about projected greenhouse gas emissions, climate change, and <br /> vulnerability to climate impacts, as well as available evidence of proven impact of <br /> actions to reduce emissions and increase climate resilience. <br /> • Actionable I Select actions that are as ambitious as possible while being realistic <br /> about factors affecting implementation, including: costs involved, available <br /> budgets, staffing and resource capacity, local mandates, timeline required, and <br /> other relevant factors. Actions should be feasible and focus on tangible steps to <br /> move the needle. <br /> • Accountable I Select actions that can be transparently evaluated, measured, <br /> and reported. Reporting and monitoring will ensure accountability to partners, <br /> stakeholders, and community members as well as uphold the principles of <br /> Pleasanton's Community of Character. <br /> Co-Benefits <br /> To help focus on and highlight other city priorities, the Committee identified the following <br /> co-benefits to consider when reviewing actions: <br /> Page 8 of 10 <br />