Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Brown indicated approval of the white strip on the top and, with the applicant's <br /> concession, it went beyond his hesitations around the General Plan, which cemented his <br /> support. <br /> Commissioner Balch moved to approve Cases P19-0128 and P19-0129 subject to the <br /> revised draft Conditions of Approval, Exhibit A as modifications were provided in a staff <br /> memorandum, with an additional modification to conditions as referenced by the <br /> applicant regarding Condition 52 and the added condition to remove the orange-colored <br /> band on the three-story building. <br /> Commissioner Pace seconded the motion. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Balch, Brown, Pace, and Ritter <br /> NOES: Commissioner Allen <br /> ABSENT: Commissioner O'Connor <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> Resolution PC-2020-13 approving Cases P19-0128 and P19-0129 was adopted, as motioned. <br /> 6. P20-0412, Amendment to Title 18 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code — Consider <br /> amendments to Chapters 18.08, 18.28, 18.32, 18.36, 18.44, 18.46, 18.84, 18.88 and <br /> 18.106 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code to comply with state legislation for accessory <br /> dwelling units. <br /> Senior Planner Shweta Bonn presented the specifics of the item in the Agenda Report. <br /> Commissioner Balch inquired about the process for existing deed restrictions. Ms. Harryman <br /> stated she would draft a termination of deed restrictions that would extinguish the restriction for <br /> the title. She explained the termination would be provided to property owners upon them <br /> contacting the City. <br /> Chair Ritter clarified language in the deed restrictions indicate the restrictions could only be <br /> removed with written permission from the City of Pleasanton. <br /> Commissioner Pace suggested informing realtors in the City about the removal of the <br /> restriction as a good way to proactively identify the properties as they have a vested interest in <br /> the marketability of their properties. <br /> Commissioner Balch asked for clarification about one-story accessory dwelling units (ADUs) <br /> since the PMC amendments indicate an ADU could not have a rooftop deck. Ms. Bonn clarified <br /> the prior draft of the ADU Ordinance prohibited decks on two-story ADUs, and the current <br /> version applied this restriction to all ADUs; the principal reason for this is attributed to the fact <br /> there is no discretionary review for ADUs. She reminded the Commission that state law and <br /> the ADU Ordinance were intended to encourage units that are affordable by design. <br /> Commissioner Balch stated he understood the restriction but would still love a Juliet balcony in <br /> an ADU if that were his unit. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7 October 28, 2020 <br />stated <br /> they were willing to remove the orange band on the three story building. <br /> Commissioner Balch withdrew his motion. Commissioner Pace withdrew his second. <br /> Commissioner Allen asked if the applicant was willing to remove the orange band from the <br /> single-story portion of the building. Mr. Miranda requested it remain. Commissioner Allen <br /> confirmed the Commission agreed the orange band could remain on the sales office and single <br /> stories. <br /> Commissioner Balch stated it was a significant compromise and agreed with keeping the <br /> orange band on the single-story buildings and the office as presented in the submitted plans. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 7 October 28, 2020 <br />