My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
111720
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2020 2:40:20 PM
Creation date
11/12/2020 2:40:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/17/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Recommendation, California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Review and <br /> Draft RHNA, Appeals Process and Final RHNA. She advised the City is currently in the RHNA <br /> Methodology Development step. <br /> Community Development Director Clark reported the 2023 — 2035 RHND Units totaled 441,176 which <br /> is a 2.35 proportionate increase over the prior cycle and noted there has been a shift in the way the <br /> income categories are allocated based on the regional determinations. She reported it is likely the City <br /> will receive an allocation in the range of 4,800 to 5,200 units but will be allowed to weigh in during each <br /> step of the process. She advised the Housing Methodology Committee (HMC) will make its <br /> recommendations by the end of this week after which the ABAG Executive Board will make its final <br /> recommendation to the HCD in the fall. <br /> Community Development Director Clark reported an area of concern from staff is Sites Inventory which <br /> is the process by which the City must identify and potentially zone sites for housing. She noted <br /> rezoning does not mean the City has to build those housing units but we demonstrate those sites are <br /> feasible and have the appropriate zoning to allow for housing at densities that can meet RHNA. She <br /> advised prior inventory will be reviewed to determine if any of those sites can be carried over into the <br /> next Housing Element along with the suitability of new high-density sites but explained the state has <br /> adopted more stringent criteria for both. She estimates 200+ acres of land could need to be identified <br /> and re-zoned for housing. <br /> Community Development Director Clark reported Senate Bill 166 is a 2017 law which limits the City's <br /> ability to downzone or approve housing at less than the density allowed in the Housing Element and <br /> explained new requirements also require consideration of the income category. She noted if the <br /> assumption is that high-density sites will deliver 100% affordable units then it creates a rolling challenge <br /> to consistently identify new sites to accommodate the lower-income housing need. <br /> Community Development Director Clark provided a brief overview of key planning considerations. She <br /> advised Housing Densities above 30 or 40 Dwelling Units per Acre (DUA) for some sites may need to <br /> be considered. She advised the City should consider proactively preparing a secondary/contingency <br /> Site list in the event it is needed under the provisions of SB 166, potentially creating a zoning "buffer" <br /> (over-zone), review density and site development assumptions, and develop criteria for ranking and <br /> selecting sites. <br /> Community Development Director Clark reviewed the process approach which recommends using the <br /> Planning Commission to provide day-to-day guidance on the details of the Housing Element along with <br /> input from the Housing Commission. She noted frequent City Council review and input, private and <br /> public agency stakeholder engagement, and public outreach will also be used in the process. She <br /> reported key tasks include project initiation, site inventory, evaluation and selection, public review of <br /> Draft Housing Element and Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR), and Final Housing Element and <br /> EIR Review including adoption and certification. <br /> Community Development Director Clark reported the process will take 24 months to complete and will <br /> commence in early 2021 with final adoption required by January 2023. She noted staff is requesting <br /> City Council authorize proceeding with an RFP to select a consultant. She advised the East Pleasanton <br /> Specific Plan (EPSP) can track with the Housing Element. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum's inquiries, Community Development Director Clark reported <br /> sites do not need to be zoned at the time the Housing Element is adopted but must be completed within <br /> three years although staff would recommend timing rezoning with the adoption of the Housing Element. <br /> She also noted the City does not give up any additional discretionary review. Lastly, she reported the <br /> City is updating its Objective Design and Development Standards which will hopefully give the City <br /> tools to review projects to be in alignment with City standards. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 3 of 7 September 15. 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.