My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
6
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
10-28
>
6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2020 5:54:05 PM
Creation date
10/21/2020 5:52:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/28/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
6_Exhibits A-E
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\10-28
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
restriction that are not reflected in the PMC, having a recorded deed restriction appears to be <br /> an unnecessary requirement. <br /> Other Changes <br /> The following additional changes to the ordinance since the July 8 meeting provide clarifying <br /> language to better articulate the objective of the code, and/or to better align with state law: <br /> • Modified the asterisk to Table 18.84.010 to refer to standards in 18.106 (the asterisk <br /> currently refers only to height exceptions). Also, this asterisk and note were added to <br /> the zoning districts that allow ADUs. <br /> • Referenced Chapter 18.106 in parking section of PMC (Chapter 18.88) so that parking <br /> standards for ADUs are itemized in Chapter 18.106 and not Chapter 18.88. <br /> • Modified proposed language to 18.106.020(F) to indicate when PUD standards do and <br /> do not apply. <br /> • Added language to describe height measurement methodology for attached ADUs. <br /> • Removed 10-foot streetside yard setback for ADUs. <br /> • Clarified that attached ADUs must meet front yard setbacks for the primary structure, <br /> except, as noted in recent guidance provided by HCD, encroachment into the front yard <br /> setback is allowed if strict compliance would preclude an ADU on the subject property, <br /> with such encroachment limited to the extent necessary to accommodate the accessory <br /> dwelling unit. <br /> • Following recent guidance from HCD, clarified that a property with multiple single-family <br /> dwellings on the same lot is considered a one-family development. And, that in a <br /> development project that has both one-family and multifamily housing types, the <br /> regulations applicable to each type of housing are to be applied, irrespective of whether <br /> those single-family or multifamily units are each located on its own lot or on a common <br /> parcel. <br /> • Reorganized the text referring to the prohibition of upper-story decks and balconies <br /> such that it applies to all ADUs (not just second-story ADUs). Therefore, a single-story <br /> ADU would also not be permitted to have a rooftop deck. <br /> • Following recent guidance from HCD, clarified that in multifamily developments, one of <br /> the following types of ADUs are permitted: ADUs resulting from conversion of non- <br /> habitable space, or up to two detached ADUs subject to specific development standards <br /> in state law. Further, also based on guidance from HCD, the maximum number of <br /> ADUs resulting from the conversion of non-habitable space is not to exceed 25% of the <br /> existing multifamily units located within each multifamily structure (not 25% of the units <br /> located in the development project as previously proposed). <br /> • Modified text that relates to the location of the entry door such that it requires the entry <br /> door to the ADU to be on a "different facade" than the door to the primary residence as <br /> P20-0412, Accessory Dwelling Units Planning Commission <br /> 5 of 7 <br />rty owners to <br /> enforceable provisions contained within the PMC, and there are no provisions of the deed <br /> This 25-foot measurement is to replace the previously proposed requirement imposing one of the window mitigations if a <br /> new window in a proposed ADU was facing either a neighboring residence or a neighboring private yard. This change is <br /> intended to simplify the standard and remove ambiguity that could arise from the term,"facing"as was discussed in response <br /> to the example presented at the July 8 Planning Commission meeting. <br /> The PMC will continue to include the provision that the owner of a property with a JADU may rent both the primary unit <br /> and the JADU to a single party. <br /> P20-0412, Accessory Dwelling Units Planning Commission <br /> 4 of 7 <br />