My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092320
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
PC 092320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2020 5:34:31 PM
Creation date
10/21/2020 5:34:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/23/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1-680 at Stoneridge Drive <br /> Chair Ritter inquired about the time to complete the construction. Mr. Tassano stated the <br /> project was anticipated to take a year, with the portion over the water taking six months. He <br /> discussed the Costco project and clarified the 1-680 at Stoneridge Drive project was not reliant <br /> on the Costco project. <br /> Commissioner Allen inquired about the update on Highway 84 and when it was scheduled for <br /> construction and completion. Mr. Tassano stated the project was fully funded and in its final <br /> design. He anticipated construction to begin Spring 2021 to 2023, but that it would most likely <br /> take nine months longer than estimated due to delays as a result of the shelter-in-place <br /> caused by the pandemic. <br /> MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br /> Chair Ritter inquired about ambient lights from the U-Haul site on Sunol Boulevard. Ms. Denis <br /> stated Code Enforcement Officer Mark Dennis has been actively involved in working with the <br /> U-Haul onsite manager on resolution, stating the video provided by the resident was helpful. <br /> ADJOURNMENT <br /> Chair Ritter adjourned the meeting at 8:16 p.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> 5Ub OAAki )6'&614% t(lCU/U <br /> Stefanie Ananthan <br /> Recording Secretary <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 5 September 23, 2020 <br />ano stated there was no shoulder. Commissioner O'Connor <br /> expressed concern there was no vehicular shoulder. Mr. Tassano discussed the difficulty in <br /> balancing the number of vehicle breakdowns versus bicyclists. <br /> Chair Ritter asked if the roadway construction would occur during the construction of Costco. <br /> Mr. Tassano stated he was not sure of Costco's schedule. <br /> Commissioner Allen asked the City's process for going back to a developer to look for <br /> additional traffic impact fees if the project was more impactful than expected. Mr. Tassano <br /> explained collection of retail fees per number of trips. He discussed the anomaly with retail <br /> trips and stated there was no way to post-collect fees. <br /> Ms. Denis asked if the driveway for Burger King and the former Specialty's Restaurant would <br /> remain open. Mr. Tassano confirmed. Ms. Denis then asked if staff had studied closing off the <br /> driveway. Mr. Tassano stated it would be difficult eliminating access points that have already <br /> been established. <br /> Commissioner Brown brought up the traffic at the intersection of Hopyard Road at Owens <br /> Drive and asked if the replacement of the Specialty's restaurant would cause more congestion <br /> at the intersection. Mr. Tassano agreed the area could be precarious to navigate, and stated <br /> the solution would be to post 'Do Not Enter' signs so as not to allow vehicles to enter in that <br /> direction, which was not normally done unless there was a problem on the street. <br /> Commissioner Brown stated it could be addressed when a new business entered the former <br /> Specialty's Restaurant site. Mr. Tassano stated the only way the City could change it was if <br /> something new was going in that space. Ms. Denis clarified the driveway was owned by the <br /> Burger King property and it could be reviewed if Burger King redeveloped. Mr. Tassano <br /> discussed the issue with people driving straight off the curb. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 5 September 23, 2020 <br />4 October 14, 2020 <br /> dwelling unit that is 800 <br /> square feet or less may be 16 feet in height regardless of the maximum height limits on the main structure,as prescribed by <br /> state law. <br /> P20-0412, Accessory Dwelling Units Planning Commission <br /> 3 of 7 <br />e and complicated. She further explained the City relied <br /> heavily on private developers in that section of town for completion of the trail. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 August 12, 2020 <br />ing/City Engineer. (Address this condition prior to <br /> permit issuance) <br /> P19-0128/P19-0129 Planning Commission <br /> Page 10 of 15 <br />ater from escaping to the north. The site grading must therefore be redesigned to provide an <br /> `emergency overland release' allowing storm water to escape the site before flooding the buildings <br /> or the neighboring properties to the west and east if the pipe network becomes plugged. (Address <br /> this condition prior to permit issuance). Project Specific Condition. <br /> P19-0128/P19-0129 Planning Commission <br /> Page 8 of 15 <br />