My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
100620
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 1:28:54 PM
Creation date
9/30/2020 10:59:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/6/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
18 Attachments
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\100620
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
would support a modification to its Sphere of Influence such that all three <br />properties are included only within Livermore's Sphere of Influence. However, <br />the City of Livermore would take the lead in securing approval for the Sphere of <br />Influence modification from Alameda LAFCo. <br />In addition, the City of Pleasanton would seek commitments from the City of <br />Livermore, to the extent permissible, to limit future city -initiated adjustments to its <br />Urban Growth Boundary in the east Pleasanton/west Livermore area, proximate <br />to the subject parcels. <br />East Pleasanton Specific Plan Participation <br />Since the properties are in close proximity to the East Pleasanton Specific Plan <br />area, the agreement would identify the City of Livermore, property owner, and <br />project developer as cooperative and constructive partners and stakeholders in <br />the specific plan process. <br />Next Steps <br />If the Council authorizes staff to proceed with developing agreements with the City of <br />Livermore and other parties, as needed. It is anticipated those would be drafted by the <br />end of this calendar year, and brought forward to the City Council for review thereafter. <br />The City of Livermore has not yet provided a timeline for the processing of any <br />applications related to the properties; however, it is expected that schedules will <br />become more clearly defined over the coming months, in conjunction with the <br />development of the agreements. As noted, timing for the annexation and development <br />of SMP -38 is potentially a longer-term proposition, which Livermore staff has suggested <br />could reasonably be coordinated with completion of the East Pleasanton Specific Plan. <br />Su"ted ted y: <br />Elle rk <br />Director of Community <br />Development <br />Attachments: <br />Fiscal Review: <br />Tina Olson <br />Director of Finance <br />Approved by: <br />Nelson Fialhc <br />City Manager <br />1. Citywide Planning Boundaries Map <br />2. Detailed Planning Boundaries Map for both Pleasanton and Livermore <br />3. Letter from the City of Livermore, dated June 29, 2020 <br />Page 10 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.