My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
090120
>
10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2020 4:42:04 PM
Creation date
8/27/2020 9:10:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/2/2020
Document Relationships
10 ATTACHMENTS
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\090120
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. PFAS Source Investigations— Preliminary groundwatertesting activities by Zone 7 <br />did not produce data that provided any clear indication of possible PFAS sources. <br />Therefore, Zone 7 has recently entered into contract with Jacobs Engineering Group <br />to perform a more detailed evaluation of potential PFAS sources and recommend <br />furtheractionsto characterize its existence in the groundwater basin. <br />2. PFAS Treatment — Zone 7 also entered into contract with Carollo Engineers to <br />perform a PFAS treatment feasibility study forth eirwells. Preliminary findings <br />indicated that Zone 7's primary focus should be on implementing IX or GAC <br />treatment at the Chain of Lake wells. It should be noted that the Mochowells and <br />Stoneridge well may only require operational changes as opposed to additional <br />treatment dependenton actual regulations. <br />3. Preliminary Discussions on Increased Zone 7 Supply— Preliminary discussions ata <br />staff level have occurred with Zone 7 on the abilityto offset City well water supply <br />(i.e. water allotmentuse) with additional purchasesfrom Zone 7. The following topics <br />for discussion were identified: <br />• The City does not currently have a formal contract with Zone 7 forwater <br />supply. Obtaining an offsetting watersupplywith Zone 7 would likelytrigger <br />the need to establish a formal contract. <br />• Additional supply from Zone would likely be groundwaterand not surface <br />water to offset City groundwater pumping from the basin. Groundwater basin <br />management issues such assalt removal, localized groundwater levels, and <br />PFAS migration impacts wou Id need to be reviewed. <br />• Meeting City supply requests at Turnout4 is already a challenge forZone 7 <br />and they have previously expressed the desire for the City to build a pump <br />station inthatarea. Furtheranalysis of this issue would be required with <br />increases in Zone 7 supply. <br />• Zone 7 has indicated thatoffsetting groundwater allotment with Zone 7 supply <br />may have impacts to Zone 7's operation and supply purchases, as well as <br />impacts to other retailers. Associated financial impactswould need to be <br />reviewed that may impact fixed and variable water costs to the City. <br />CONCLUSION <br />Based on efforts to date, staff recommends the following: <br />1. The planning and design of a self -implemented PFAS treatment project should <br />proceed for all three wells. <br />• It is plausible that all wells will exceed future PFAS regulations. <br />• It gives the City the most implementation control to meet a potentially <br />aggressive regulatory schedule. <br />• Currently, a regional treatment facility does notseem likely considering Zone <br />7 is focusing efforts at the Chain of Lake wells. <br />Page 7 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.