My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
090120
>
10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2020 4:42:04 PM
Creation date
8/27/2020 9:10:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/2/2020
Document Relationships
10 ATTACHMENTS
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\090120
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Prioritize efforts on advancing the planning, design, and construction of self - <br />implemented PFAS treatment at City wells. The primary reason is that this solution <br />allows the City to maintain implementation control againsta potentially tight <br />regulatory deadline. <br />Continue to explore regional solutionswith Zone 7 on a parallel path. <br />Include flexibility and checkpoints in the work plan that allows adjustments to or off - <br />ramps from self -implementation as variables get furtherdefined. <br />The schedule shown is preliminary and forgeneral guidance atthis time. The schedule <br />will be defined in more detail as planning and design progresses, and as DDW <br />regulatory schedules are further detailed. <br />The City has completed activities from the initial phases of the work plan and a <br />summary of their outcomes are listed below. <br />PFAS Treatment Feasibility at City Wells <br />The City hired Carollo Engineers to perform a feasibility study of PFAS treatment at <br />Wells 5, 6, and 8. Refer to Technical Memorandum 3 included as part of the July 2020 <br />Water Quality Evaluation located at the following link: Water Quality Evaluation. <br />1. The evaluation considered three treatment goals that bracket possible future PFAS <br />regulations: <br />• High Treatment Goal — Equivalentto current response levels for PFOA and <br />PFOS. <br />• Medium Treatment Goal— Equivalentto current notification levels for PFOA <br />and PFOS. <br />• Low Treatment Goal —Reduce PFAS concentrations (EPA 537/537.1) below <br />current detection limits. <br />2. The evaluation considered fourtreatment options: <br />• Blending—This method was found to not be technically feasible and <br />eliminated from furtherconsideration. <br />• Reverse Osmosis Treatment —This method was found to not be economically <br />feasible and eliminated from further consideration. <br />• <br />Gran u lar Activated Carbon (GAC) Treatment <br />o Removes PFAS by adsorption2. <br />o In general, requires more GAC media and thus vessels3on a per unit <br />treatment basis when compared to ion exchange treatment. However, the <br />unitcost of GAC media is less expensive than the media used in ion <br />exchange. <br />o Once the GAC media can no longer sufficiently remove PFAS, the media <br />and trapped PFAS molecules are typically incinerated and destroyed. <br />z Adsorption is the process of removing contaminants or unwanted molecules from water by their adhesion to a <br />treatment material (also known as media). <br />3 Vessels are hollow containers used to hold media. Vessels facilitate the adsorption process by allowing water to be <br />passed through them edia. <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.