Laserfiche WebLink
members for their favorite projects. The projects identified in the Committee member letters <br /> would cost well over $300,000, likely closer to $1.5 million, and that kind of funding would not <br /> come out of the Public Storage project. He explained that the City could get grant funding for <br /> the bigger projects, but in his view the City should take the opportunity as it came before the <br /> City. He anticipated the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Committee members, given the <br /> opportunity for additional review of the item, would agree it was a good project. Mr. Tassano <br /> expressed his confidence that the Committee would support this project given the context he <br /> had provided. He recommended not holding up this project and incorporating a condition of <br /> approval qualifying the funds allocation if something changed. Commissioner Allen expressed <br /> her agreement with that recommendation. Commissioner Pace concurred. <br /> MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION/INFORMATION <br /> 8. Reports from Meetings Attended (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) <br /> Chair Ritter stated he and Commissioner Allen attended the 2025 Forum on schools in <br /> Pleasanton. <br /> 9. Future Planning Calendar <br /> Planning and Permit Center Manager Melinda Denis gave a brief overview of future items for <br /> the Commission's review. <br /> MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br /> Chair Ritter inquired about the Permit Center process and informed staff he had received a <br /> complaint from a resident over the recent permitting process and the delay in receiving a <br /> permit. Ms. Denis admitted to difficulties at the beginning of operating under Alameda County <br /> Health Department's Shelter-in-Place Order and the various efforts from staff to hone the <br /> process. She stated there was previously a 7-10 day delay but that had since dropped to 1-2 <br /> days. She then mentioned staff also brought on consultant staff to help cover for any employee <br /> illnesses or when staff were on vacation, and to help tackle the sheer volume of applications <br /> received, which has doubled from the amount received prior to the shelter-in-place. She stated <br /> the departments continue to communicate with each other to ensure the system was working <br /> and she encouraged the Commissioners to provide any additional feedback received. <br /> ADJOURNMENT <br /> Chair Ritter adjourned the meeting at 8:24 p.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> ate_ MAA0/1/L <br /> Stefanie A nanthan <br /> Recording Secretary <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 7 August 12, 2020 <br />with the Planning Commission, City Council, and the Bicycle, <br /> Pedestrian, and Trails Committee, along with doing a large amount of public outreach. They <br /> then vetted all of the trail options over the course of the year. The trail identified in the Public <br /> Storage project connected Downtown, east, to the Iron Horse Trail, making it a year-round, <br /> Class One trail. She then explained the ranking system used to identify the trail as priority <br /> number one and reasserted her excitement to work on the trail as it was previously assumed it <br /> would not be possible due to lack of funding. <br /> Commissioner Allen again expressed her concern about the dissent amongst the BPTC and <br /> inquired whether there was anything of concern the Planning Commission should know about. <br /> City Traffic Engineer Mike Tassano informed Commissioner Allen that he had read the letters <br /> received from the various Committee members and believed additional opportunity to discuss <br /> the proposal would reflect a balanced consideration of this project versus the hundreds of <br /> projects across the City. The letters expressed the passion of those specific Committee <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 7 August 12, 2020 <br />