My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Minutes_August 12, 2020
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
08-26
>
_Minutes_August 12, 2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2020 3:25:07 PM
Creation date
8/19/2020 3:24:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/26/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
members for their favorite projects. The projects identified in the Committee member letters <br /> would cost well over $300,000, likely closer to $1.5 million, and that kind of funding would not <br /> come out of the Public Storage project. He explained that the City could get grant funding for <br /> the bigger projects, but in his view the City should take the opportunity as it came before the <br /> City. He anticipated the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Committee members, given the <br /> opportunity for additional review of the item, would agree it was a good project. Mr. Tassano <br /> expressed his confidence that the Committee would support this project given the context he <br /> had provided. He recommended not holding up this project and incorporating a condition of <br /> approval qualifying the funds allocation if something changed. Commissioner Allen expressed <br /> her agreement with that recommendation. Commissioner Pace concurred. <br /> MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION/INFORMATION <br /> 8. Reports from Meetings Attended (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) <br /> Chair Ritter stated he and Commissioner Allen attended the 2025 Forum on schools in <br /> Pleasanton. <br /> 9. Future Planning Calendar <br /> Planning and Permit Center Manager Melinda Denis gave a brief overview of future items for <br /> the Commission's review. <br /> MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br /> Chair Ritter inquired about the Permit Center process and informed staff he had received a <br /> complaint from a resident over the recent permitting process and the delay in receiving a <br /> permit. Ms. Denis admitted to difficulties at the beginning of operating under Alameda County <br /> Health Department's Shelter-in-Place Order and the various efforts from staff to hone the <br /> process. She stated there was previously a 7-10 day delay but that had since dropped to 1-2 <br /> days. She then mentioned staff also brought on consultant staff to help cover for any employee <br /> illnesses or when staff were on vacation, and to help tackle the sheer volume of applications <br /> received, which has doubled from the amount received prior to the shelter-in-place. She stated <br /> the departments continue to communicate with each other to ensure the system was working <br /> and she encouraged the Commissioners to provide any additional feedback received. <br /> ADJOURNMENT <br /> Chair Ritter adjourned the meeting at 8:24 p.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Stefanie Ananthan <br /> Recording Secretary <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 7 August 12, 2020 <br />ified in the Public <br /> Storage project connected Downtown, east, to the Iron Horse Trail, making it a year-round, <br /> Class One trail. She then explained the ranking system used to identify the trail as priority <br /> number one and reasserted her excitement to work on the trail as it was previously assumed it <br /> would not be possible due to lack of funding. <br /> Commissioner Allen again expressed her concern about the dissent amongst the BPTC and <br /> inquired whether there was anything of concern the Planning Commission should know about. <br /> City Traffic Engineer Mike Tassano informed Commissioner Allen that he had read the letters <br /> received from the various Committee members and believed additional opportunity to discuss <br /> the proposal would reflect a balanced consideration of this project versus the hundreds of <br /> projects across the City. The letters expressed the passion of those specific Committee <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 7 August 12, 2020 <br />hough it was ranked as the number one priority <br /> from the community, it was expensive and complicated. She further explained the City relied <br /> heavily on private developers in that section of town for completion of the trail. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 August 12, 2020 <br />�• <br /> } * yo- r e 7 X �S:`, yqJ '_ i ti+ "x',. y �3 f � 4, t <br /> Iv <br /> 7. <br /> .. .��, ERI;I L ;; ,,�• L`D .13LRNAL ., / Ee ('�11� n 1 .e. 7r `� t, - wan <br /> 2 t� ti► 't 6 y ;.4.'"...'-is <br /> f 1' '* uw (� 7 <br /> J1r <br /> 1:6,580 <br /> o 0.075 0.'5 mi P20-0568, 218 RAY ST, NAG U I BMftelISISM <br /> Planning Division <br /> 0 i <br /> 0 4110 820 Feet l August 17,2ozo ['L-EA AN foN. <br />