5 - Laserfiche WebLink

Other Questions The plan set provided is currently incomplete but would need to be expanded to include: site plan, floor plans, full elevations, landscape plan, photo simulations, color and material board, specifications of the parking lift, utility plan, and fencing plan. Discussion Point#4 7. Is there additional information needed to assist the Commission in its decision on the proposal? PUBLIC NOTICE Notice of this workshop was sent to property owners and tenants/occupants within 1,000 feet of the site as shown in Exhibit A. At the time of report publication, staff has not received any public comments. Public comments received after publication of this report will be forwarded to the Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Since the Planning Commission will take no formal action on the project at the workshop, no environmental document accompanies this workshop report. Environmental determination will be provided in conjunction with the Planning Commission's formal review of the Design Review application. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Staff requests the Commission to review the proposal, hear all public testimony, and provide comments to staff and the applicant regarding the preliminary application. Primary Author: Megan Campbell, Associate Planner 925-931-5610 or mcambbell ancityofbleasantonca.gov. Reviewed/Approved By: Steve Otto, Senior Planner Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development P20-0568, 218 Ray Street Planning Commission 11 of 11 ural style and design of the proposed building acceptable? 5. Does the Planning Commission support the proposed rooftop deck or second-floor balcony? Site Design The proposed access to the site does not include a turnaround and the Traffic Division has commented that a vehicle turnaround will be required to allow adequate space for ingress vehicles to turnaround in the event all parking spaces are occupied. To accommodate a turnaround, it will likely result in the loss of further parking, though the implications cannot be evaluated until further site analysis is provided by the applicant. The project provides outdoor space for the residential unit behind the unit and within the proposed rooftop deck and second-floor balcony. Parking for the residential unit is provided through the carport attached to the building with commercial parking provided along the western side of the lot in both surface parking and the parking lift. The proposed lift, if supported by the Commission, is proposed toward the front (north) of the parking so the existing commercial building can help provide some screening of the lift from the street. The treatment of the lift (i.e., screening/visibility) will be important to consider with review of the formal application submittal. The residential trash enclosures are shown on the plans behind the carport, however, the site layout does not currently account for the commercial trash enclosure which is currently located where the residential unit is now proposed. This will have to be addressed in the site plan when a formal application is submitted. Discussion Point #3 6. Aside from providing a vehicle turnaround and a trash enclosure, is the site layout acceptable? P20-0568, 218 Ray Street Planning Commission 10 of 11 d above but will comply with the DSP P20-0568, 218 Ray Street Planning Commission 8 of 11