My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
07-08
>
5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2020 12:30:32 PM
Creation date
7/2/2020 12:06:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/8/2020
Document Relationships
5_Exhibits A-C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\07-08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Parties opposed to owner-occupancy requirements indicating that deed restrictions can <br /> "preclude the lender from occupying the property if lenders must foreclose on the <br /> property." <br /> At this time, particularly since it is uncertain whether the state law will be amended to prohibit <br /> owner-occupancy permanently, staff recommends retaining the owner-occupancy requirement <br /> related to ADUs approved prior to January 1, 2020. If the owner-occupancy provision is <br /> permanently removed in state law, the PMC could be amended at that time to indicate that all <br /> properties with ADUs, including those approved prior to January 1, 2020, do not require either <br /> the principal residence or the ADU to be owner-occupied. <br /> Conversion of Existing Amenities in Multifamily Developments <br /> As mentioned in this report, a Commissioner at the June 24 meeting suggested that multifamily <br /> developments not be prohibited from converting certain amenity areas to an ADU(s), <br /> particularly if that amenity is not well-used. Amenities such as laundry rooms, gyms, and <br /> community halls serve to provide a convenient facility to residents and are oftentimes <br /> negotiated during the approval process of multifamily development. Without reliable <br /> prescriptive measures to determine the level of use of a particular amenity, and assuming the <br /> amenity is used at least some of the time by a proportion of residents, staff proposes to retain <br /> language proposed in the PMC related to prohibiting amenity areas to be converted to ADUs. <br /> Windows in Second Story ADUs <br /> The Planning Commission asked staff to make the requirements for windows on second story <br /> ADUs more flexible by factoring in existing windows and allowing more flexibility on placement <br /> and size of new windows. <br /> The standards for windows in second story ADUs are intended to address two elements: new <br /> second story windows potentially overlooking (or looking into) an adjacent residence; and into <br /> an adjacent private yard. For adjacent residences, the PMC establishes separation <br /> requirements between structures on adjacent properties, in addition to typical setback <br /> requirements. These separations range from 17 to 20 feet, depending on the relative number <br /> of stories of the adjacent structures.3 These standards apply to accessory structures and <br /> would be applicable to second story ADUs, whether attached or detached. <br /> The following standards are proposed to address these two conditions. They seek to allow <br /> flexibility where windows are not directly facing an adjacent residence or private yard. They <br /> would not be required the distance between the ADU and an existing structure is more than 25 <br /> feet, or when facing a yard, the ADU is more than 15 feet from the shared property line. <br /> Windows in an ADU Proposed as a Second-Story Addition to a Main Structure, or within a <br /> detached ADU <br /> The following standards are proposed: <br /> • At least one of the following measures must be implemented for new windows facing <br /> any neighboring residence that is less than 25 feet from the proposed ADU: <br /> Specifically, two, two-story structures must be separated by a minimum of 20 feet, whereas a single-story and a <br /> two-story structure must be separated by at least 17 feet. <br /> P20-0412, Accessory Dwelling Units Planning Commission <br /> 7 of 9 <br />rements, the amendments to the PMC <br /> propose to add the following language: <br /> Restrictive covenants for accessory dwelling units approved between January 1,2020 and January 1,2025 <br /> shall not include a provision requiring owner occupancy of the primary dwelling or the accessory dwelling <br /> unit. <br /> After the June 24 Planning Commission meeting, staff also modified the language in PMC Section 18.106.060(A) <br /> such that it refers to ADUs approved both before and after January 1, 2020. <br /> P20-0412, Accessory Dwelling Units Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 9 <br />ing windows to allow for those windows to be the same size, shape, and height. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 9 June 24, 2020 <br />