My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
07-08
>
5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2020 12:30:32 PM
Creation date
7/2/2020 12:06:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/8/2020
Document Relationships
5_Exhibits A-C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\07-08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C. Does the Planning Commission have a preference for the treatment of garage doors <br /> where the garage space is converted to an ADU? <br /> The Planning Commission concurred with staffs recommendation, that the property owner <br /> should be allowed to decide whether to keep a garage door or to infill its space with colors <br /> and materials to match the primary dwelling unit when a garage space is converted to an <br /> ADU. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The following discussion points are follow-up to the Planning Commission's June 24, 2020, <br /> meeting. <br /> ADU Square Footage <br /> In response to Planning Commission's direction to simplify language regarding maximum <br /> permitted square footage, staff proposes the following revisions to Section 18.106.040(B) and <br /> Section 18.106.045(C) for attached and detached ADUs respectively: <br /> Attached ADUs, PMC 18.106.040(B): <br /> The gross floor area of an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 50 percent of <br /> the gross floor area of the existing main dwelling unit, with a maximum increase in floor <br /> area of 1,200 square feet. The gross floor area of the existing main dwelling unit is to be <br /> calculated based on the size of the unit prior to the accessory dwelling unit/conversion. In <br /> no case shall this requirement necessitate an accessory dwelling unit to be less than: (1) a <br /> 150 square foot efficiency unit; (2) 850 square feet if the accessory dwelling unit is a <br /> studio or one-bedroom unit; or(3) 1,000 square feet if the accessory dwelling unit is two <br /> or more bedrooms. <br /> Detached ADUs, PMC 18.106.045(C): <br /> The gross floor area of a detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 1,200 square <br /> feet. <br /> Staff believes this language is consistent with the state law. It more clearly states that the <br /> actual maximum allowable increase in square footage is not to exceed 50 percent of the <br /> existing square footage. Since the allowable ADU size based on the 50 percent calculation <br /> could vary widely, depending on the size of the primary unit, the text clarifies that the maximum <br /> size allowable would be 1,200 square feet, and that an 850 or 1,000 square foot unit must be <br /> allowed, even if it would exceed the 50 percent limit. <br /> P20-0412, Accessory Dwelling Units Planning Commission <br /> 3 of 9 <br />lowed to be converted <br /> to an ADU, particularly if it was not being utilized often. The draft ordinance called <br /> for limiting conversion of these types of spaces. <br /> B. Does the Planning Commission agree with staff's proposed objective standards for <br /> second story ADUs? <br /> The Planning Commission indicated that the objective standards for upper windows in two- <br /> story ADUs were too restrictive as proposed and directed staff to draft more flexible <br /> standards that would 1) Account for existing windows and 2) Allow more flexibility on <br /> placement and size of new windows. One Commissioner also commented that a provision <br /> for decorative balconies should be added to the standards. <br /> P20-0412, Accessory Dwelling Units Planning Commission <br /> 2 of 9 <br />egulations. She explained staff decided on these standards, in the absence of being able to <br /> conduct design review, because they were the most common points of contention between <br /> neighbors. Commissioner O'Connor suggested looking at each unit individually instead of <br /> applying blanket standards. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 9 June 24, 2020 <br />and ridges and ADUs measured from the ground to the top of the structure. Commissioner <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 9 June 24, 2020 <br />ing Commission Minutes Page 4 of 9 June 24, 2020 <br />e windows would have to be six feet above the finished floor or have <br /> obscured glass. Ms. Clark further noted, it might be reasonable to develop exceptions for <br /> existing windows to allow for those windows to be the same size, shape, and height. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 9 June 24, 2020 <br />