Laserfiche WebLink
Managing Tomorrow's Resources Today <br /> Ms. Becky Hopkins <br /> May 15, 2020 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> 2. Scope of Work <br /> HF&H compared PGS's Rate Application dated March 27, 2020 to the Agreement (specifically Exhibit H — <br /> Index-Based Rate Adjustment Mechanism, and Exhibit F — Contractor's Total Proposed Costs for Rate <br /> Period One) dated March 5, 2018: <br /> A. PGS's Index Based Rate Adjustment Application Worksheet dated March 27, 2020 (Worksheet) <br /> Rate Period 2 Column annual costs agreed in total to the annual costs from the prior year's <br /> approved requested rate increase. <br /> B. PGS's Worksheet Adjustment Index Column (showing the indices to be used in the adjustment) <br /> agrees to Exhibit H Table 2 with one exception for the Adjustment Index for Landfill <br /> Maintenance/Closure. Exhibit H, Section 3.C.9 provides that the "Landfill Maintenance and <br /> Closure Costs for each Rate Period shall mean the amount to which Contractor is entitled for the <br /> prior Rate Period pursuant to the terms of that certain 'Agreement Approving an Expenditure of <br /> Funds to Close Former Landfill between the City and the Contractor' dated October 7, 1986 and <br /> attached as Exhibit 0". PGS has included $141,766 of expenses for Rate Period Three which <br /> represents actual expenditures from January to December 2019 including: engineering services; <br /> gas monitoring; and, State Water Resources Control Board permit fees. This represents a <br /> decrease of$61,003 compared to Rate Period Two which appears to be reasonable and allowable <br /> under the Landfill Closure Agreement. <br /> C. The calculations in the PGS Worksheet Rate Period Three column were reviewed and agreed to <br /> with one exception. In the City Fees cost category, PGS included $60,000 for a Performance <br /> Review in Rate Period Three, however the amount for a Performance Review was previously <br /> included in Rate Period Two and no additional funds related to the review are required by the City <br /> in Rate Period Three. As background, Section 6.14 of the Agreement provides the City the ability <br /> to conduct a detailed review of PGS's performance, and establishes a budget for such review <br /> ($60,000), which is to be funded by PGS. The Agreement further establishes that this expense is <br /> an allowable cost which may be recovered through the rates. <br /> D. The Current Monthly Rates and Proposed Monthly Rates (effective July 1, 2020) (Schedule 4 <br /> Current and Proposed Customer Collection Rate Schedules)were reviewed and updated to reflect <br /> the adjusted proposed increase of 1.7% (see Attachment C for revised Schedule 4). <br /> E. PGS did not include in its Application an amount for the line item "[0.50% Franchise Fee funded <br /> by Prepaid Rate Reserve Credit]". Section 3.e.i of the Reserve Agreement between PGS and the <br /> City made as of March 20, 2018 permits, but does not require,the City to"apply from the Reserve <br /> an amount equal to 0.5% of the sum of the actual Gross Rate Revenues and Transfer Station <br /> Revenues each rate year to supplement the 3.5% franchise fees required under the New <br /> Collection Agreement".As of the completion of this review the City has not elected to utilize any <br /> of the Reserve funds in Rate Period Three. <br />