My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
051920
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2020 3:23:43 PM
Creation date
5/14/2020 3:23:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
k� <br /> FIRSTCARBON Cover Letter <br /> ULU4i t.Ji. <br /> April 3, 2020(Revised April 14,2020 and May 7,2020) <br /> UNITED STATES <br /> T+1888 826 5814 <br /> Jennifer Soo,Associate Planner T+17145084100 <br /> F+1 714 508 4110 <br /> City of Pleasanton Einfo@fcs-intl.com <br /> CommunityDevelopment Department 2 25Irvine <br /> p p 0 Commerce <br /> Pleasanton CA 94566 Suite 250 <br /> Pleasanton, Irvine,CA 92602 <br /> Bay Area <br /> 1350 Treat Boulevard <br /> Subject: Proposal to Prepare a CEQA Section 15182 and 15183 Statutory Exemption for WalnuttCreek,CA 94597 <br /> the Spotorno Ranch Reduced Development Project in the City of Pleasanton Central Valley <br /> 7265 N.First Street <br /> Suite 101 <br /> Fresno,CA 93720 <br /> Dear Jenn : Inland Empire <br /> Jenny: 650 E.Hospitality Lane <br /> Suite 125 <br /> San Bernardino,CA 92408 <br /> FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS) is pleased to submit this Scope of Work,schedule, and fee for the Sacramento Valley <br /> 2204 Plaza Drive <br /> preparation of an Initial Study and consistency analysis for the Spotorno Ranch Reduced Suite 210 <br /> Rocklin,CA 95765 <br /> Development Project(proposed project), in the Happy Valley Area of the City of Pleasanton Utah <br /> 2901 Bluegrass Boulevard <br /> (City).These documents would be used to support a finding of consistency under Suite 200-62 <br /> Lehi,UT 84043 <br /> Government Code 65457,as implemented, in accordance with section 15182(a)and 15183 of Connecticut <br /> 2 Corporate Drive <br /> the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Suite450 <br /> Shelton,CT 06484 <br /> New York <br /> The project site was originally analyzed pursuant to the Environmental Impact Report(EIR) lO Monument Street <br /> Deposit,NY 13754 <br /> prepared for the Happy Valley Specific Plan (HVSP)Where there is a certified EIR for a specific 56 Broome Corporate Parkway <br /> plan,CEQA exempts projects consistent with specific plans from further CEQA review under Conklin,NY 13748 <br /> Government Code Section 65457 and Public Resources Code Section 21155.4.The CANADA <br /> requirements for both provisions are found in Guidelines Section 15182.The exemptions UNITED KINGDOM <br /> effectively serve, or can serve, as CEQA streamlining provisions based on the preparation of a PORTUGAL <br /> plan level EIR. FRANCE <br /> KENYA <br /> Based on a preliminary review of the available documents related to the proposed project, <br /> AUSTRALIA <br /> and the proposed project density,the proposed project appears to be consistent with the <br /> development anticipated and analyzed in the HVSP EIR and the Pleasanton General Plan PHIUPPINES <br /> 2005-2025 EIR(General Plan EIR).To support the decision to process the project approvals CHINA <br /> pursuant to the 15182 and 15183 CEQA streamlining provisions, FCS will prepare an Initial MALAYSIA <br /> Study,which would briefly disclose the evidence and reasoning for determining the proposed SINGAPORE <br /> project's consistency with the HVSP,the HVSP EIR,and eligibility for the 15182 and 15183 <br /> CEQA exemptions. Under the Section 15182 and 15183 processes,a public review period is <br /> not required. <br /> To facilitate this review, FCS will utilize analysis completed in support of a Subsequent Draft <br /> Environmental Impact Report prepared by FCS in 2018(2018 Draft SEIR),which evaluated the <br /> development of 39 single-family detached units that were proposed as part of the Spotorno <br /> Ranch Project.The proposed 39-units would have been located in the same Spotorno Flat <br /> area and thus the analysis can appropriately be utilized in support of this Consistency <br /> Checklist. <br /> NORTH AMERICA I EUROPE I AFRICA I AUSTRALIA I ASIA <br /> FIRSTCARBONSOLUTIONS.COM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.