My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
050520
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2020 4:54:47 PM
Creation date
4/30/2020 4:54:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/5/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that these types of businesses have an age requirement for individuals entering the premises. <br /> She was not in support of allowing any new tobacco stores. <br /> Commissioner Balch asked, and Ms. Seto confirmed that the age limit to enter a tobacco shop <br /> was 18- years old, or the individual must be accompanied by an adult. Commissioner Allen <br /> suggested treating tobacco shops and retailers the same. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor opined that tobacco stores and tobacco retailers were essentially the <br /> same and should be treated as such. He stated such a small number of retailers would be <br /> affected therefore it would not make much of an impact to grandfather them. In addition, it <br /> would then invite those individuals from surrounding cities to purchase tobacco products from <br /> locations within the City. <br /> Commissioner Balch clarified that 5-6 retailers were within the school buffer and 18-22 retailers <br /> were within 1,000 feet of parks and recreational facilities. <br /> Commissioner Balch inquired about Commissioner O'Connor's previous comment regarding <br /> the limited number of tobacco retailers who would be affected if exempted, stating if there are <br /> 18-22 tobacco retailers within the 1,000-foot buffer who are affected, it equates to half of the <br /> tobacco retailers within the City. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor agreed that it is a larger number than he had just noted. However, he <br /> stated he doesn't feel that allowing existing retailers to continue to operate will result in change <br /> because it won't stop the sale of tobacco products, it will just prevent tobacco sales from being <br /> more widespread. He continued by stating that tobacco sales need to be eliminated in order to <br /> achieve the desired change and make an impact. He recommended implementing regulations <br /> on vaping similar to the surrounding cities. <br /> Ms. Clark explained that tobacco stores would require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in all <br /> zones, which might be a mechanism to reduce such stores. <br /> Commissioner Balch suggested reviewing the sting operations to determine whether <br /> conditions of CUPs had been enforced. He suggested implementing tobacco retail licenses <br /> throughout the City and a citywide ban on e-cigarettes and flavored tobacco sales. He further <br /> stated he is disheartened that the City hasn't been at the forefront of this topic to date. <br /> Additionally, he stated grandfathering would not make the desired change, as it would prevent <br /> the situation from getting worse but wouldn't make it better; if grandfathering were permitted, <br /> then "going dark", tobacco retail license, and a two-strike consequence must be implemented <br /> as a requirement, and tobacco shops not excluded. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor suggested a one-year transition period if grandfathering was not <br /> permitted. <br /> Commissioner Balch discussed the location of parks throughout the City, therefore, impacting <br /> more retailers. <br /> Commissioner Allen asked Commissioner Balch if he would still encourage "going dark" if <br /> licensing was not implemented. <br /> Excerpt: Draft Planning Commission Minutes, January 15, 2020 Page 6 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.