My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
041520
>
02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2020 5:45:12 PM
Creation date
4/13/2020 5:45:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/15/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The state and the County of Alameda have taken a number of steps, as described <br /> above, to protect tenants from being evicted loss of income due to COVID-19. <br /> However, on April 6, 2020, the California Judicial Council approved a temporary <br /> emergency order which essentially stops all unlawful detainer actions in the state. At the <br /> same time, the Judicial Council also approved another temporary emergency order <br /> suspending judicial foreclosures. Many believe that this is the widest-reaching state <br /> action taken during the crisis so far. <br /> Created in 1926 by constitutional amendment, and chaired by the Chief Justice, the <br /> Judicial Council is the policymaking body for California's state court system. Therefore, <br /> the Judicial Council's order will apply to all courts in the state. <br /> Under the order, courts may not issue a summons on an unlawful detainer complaint <br /> until 90 days after the Governor declares the state of emergency related to the COVID- <br /> 19 pandemic is lifted. This rule applies to all new unlawful detainer actions —whether or <br /> not the eviction action is related to nonpayment of rent for COVID-19 related issues. <br /> The only exception is for an unlawful detainer action necessary to protect public health <br /> and safety. <br /> Given the far-reaching scope of the Judicial Council's order, staff is not recommending <br /> that the City Council enact a separate Citywide eviction moratorium at this time but does <br /> recommend adopting the attached resolution supporting the County of Alameda and <br /> State actions described in this report. <br /> Jointly su itted by: ,. <br /> Nelson Fialho Daniel Sodergren <br /> City Manager Vo-- City Attorney <br /> Attachment: <br /> 1. Proposed Resolution <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.