My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012220
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
PC 012220
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2020 4:17:49 PM
Creation date
3/12/2020 4:17:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 2. PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks/Marks Architects, Inc. for Jinglebells LLC — <br /> Application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Modification to remove an <br /> existing PUD (PUD-89-6) condition of approval prohibiting a drive-through restaurant on <br /> "Pad B" within Phase Ill of the Rose Pavilion Shopping Center. The proposed modification <br /> would facilitate the demolition of an existing oil change facility and the construction of a new <br /> approximately 1,649-square-foot drive-through Taco Bell restaurant and related site <br /> improvements on "Pad B" located at 4210 Rosewood Drive. Zoning for the property is <br /> PUD-C (Planned Unit Development— Commercial) District. <br /> Associate Planner Eric Luchini presented the specifics of the item in the Agenda Report. <br /> Commissioner Pace requested background on the prohibition of drive-through use. <br /> Mr. Luchini stated it was unclear as to why the City Council imposed the condition. <br /> Commissioner Pace referenced the Starbucks in the Rose Pavilion shopping center and <br /> inquired about the condition and whether that was in place for the Starbucks location. <br /> Mr. Luchini responded that fast food restaurants typically had higher trip generation rates as <br /> opposed to a sit-down restaurant. He referenced the Climate Action Plan (CAP) and air quality <br /> measures and the reasons why the denial was being recommended versus what was allowed <br /> for Starbucks at the time. <br /> Commissioner Pace asked if a new CAP was in place. <br /> Mr. Luchini stated the existing CAP discussed efforts to reduce air quality impacts including <br /> walkability, but the new CAP was not complete. <br /> Vice Chair Brown asked for clarification pertaining to Starbucks and the PUD in question. <br /> Mr. Luchini confirmed that Phase 2 did not include a restriction on drive-throughs and the <br /> restriction in Phase 3 was enacted at the time of PUD creation. <br /> Commissioner Balch asked if staff recommended no new drive-throughs be permitted in town. <br /> Community Development Director Ellen Clark responded that was not a policy discussion that <br /> had been had to date. <br /> Commissioner Balch discussed the zoning for the former Denny's site and the Chick-Fil-A, <br /> both located at Hopyard Road and Owens Drive, and asked for clarification on the zoning for <br /> Rose Pavilion. <br /> Mr. Luchini responded that Phase II of Rose Pavilion was straight zoned, whereas Phase Ill <br /> had a PUD. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 13 January 22, 2020 <br />RMATION <br /> 5. Reports from Meetings Attended (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) <br /> There were no reports from meetings attended. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 11 January 15, 2020 <br />in tobacco or tobacco-related products, and <br /> that the legal age permitted to enter a tobacco store is 18 years old, or the individual must be <br /> accompanied by an adult, or with another individual over the age of 18 years old. <br /> Commissioner Brown stated that the difference to him was that a "go dark" provision made <br /> sense for tobacco retailers where underage individuals are still being exposed to tobacco <br /> products, tobacco advertising, and the like. He noted it could be difficult to "go dark" in a store <br /> that sells 100 percent tobacco products. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 11 January 15, 2020 <br /> <br />