My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 011520
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
PC 011520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2020 4:16:01 PM
Creation date
3/12/2020 4:15:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/15/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Brown referenced the percentages in the survey and inquired how youth were <br /> obtaining tobacco related products. <br /> Ms. Seto referenced page 2 of the agenda report and the percentages of how youth obtained <br /> tobacco products. <br /> Commissioner Brown asked and confirmed the dilemma was that the products were coming <br /> from a physical retailer. He asked if neighboring cities were not exempting retailers. <br /> Ms. Seto responded that the Cities of both Livermore and Dublin were exempting existing <br /> retailers and she was still researching other cities. <br /> Commissioner Brown inquired about the vote at the City of Dublin City Council meeting <br /> pertaining to exemptions and referenced the impact of neighboring cities. <br /> Ms. Seto stated the City of Dublin City Council had voted affirmatively on the citywide ban on <br /> flavored tobacco and citywide ban on electronic smoking paraphernalia and that the buffer was <br /> a preexisting restriction. She also referenced Alameda County restrictions. <br /> Commissioner Brown referenced "going dark" and inquired if that was discussed at the Youth <br /> Commission meeting. Ms. Seto stated "going dark" was first raised by retailers at the <br /> Economic Vitality Committee meeting. Commissioner Brown inquired about the meeting with <br /> existing retailers. Ms. Seto explained that the retailers had provided suggestions including <br /> "going dark." <br /> Commissioner Balch inquired about recreation facilities versus parks; he referenced <br /> Gingerbread Preschool and clarified it was within Amador Park. <br /> Ms. Seto clarified that the Senior Center was a recreation facility. <br /> Commissioner Balch referenced the three high schools indicating there were no retailers within <br /> 1,000-feet of the schools. He stated students traveled further to obtain tobacco products. <br /> Ms. Seto clarified that Amador High School was not within 1,000 feet of the Safeway on Santa <br /> Rita Road, however, Alisal Elementary School was within 1,000 feet of the Safeway. <br /> Commissioner Balch referenced Commissioner Brown's comment about "going dark" and <br /> whether the retailers were agreeable to that suggestion. Ms. Seto explained that the group <br /> discussion raised various retailers' suggestions. <br /> Commissioner Balch discussed his opinion that the Youth Commission would like change <br /> within the 1,000-foot buffer and he mentioned grandfathering existing tobacco retailers, which <br /> had been brought up by the Economic Vitality Committee and whether that was the change the <br /> Youth Commission had been seeking. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired about grandfathering regarding the buffer options and asked <br /> what other cities were doing. He also inquired about the expected change and the impact for <br /> the future. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 11 January 15, 2020 <br />