Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 1 <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 20- <br /> A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON, <br /> DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) <br /> MAJOR MODIFICATION TO REMOVE AN EXISTING PUD (PUD-89-6) CONDITION <br /> OF APPROVAL PROHIBITING A DRIVE-THROUGH RESTAURANT ON "PAD B" <br /> WITHIN PHASE III OF THE ROSE PAVILION SHOPPING CENTER. <br /> WHEREAS, on October 14, 2019, Gabriela Marks of Marks Architects, Inc. on behalf of <br /> Jinglebells, LLC ("Applicant") applied for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Modification <br /> to remove an existing PUD (PUD-89-6) condition of approval prohibiting a drive-through <br /> restaurant on "Pad B" within Phase III of the Rose Pavilion Shopping Center ("Project"). The <br /> proposed modification would facilitate an application to demolish an existing oil change facility <br /> and the construction of a new approximately 1,649-square-foot drive-through Taco Bell <br /> restaurant and related site improvements on "Pad B" at 4210 Rosewood Drive; and <br /> WHEREAS, the site is designated Retail/Highway/Service Commercial/Business and <br /> Professional Offices in the General Plan; and <br /> WHEREAS, the existing PUD rezone and development plan (PUD-89-6) contains a <br /> condition of approval prohibiting a drive-through restaurant on "Pad B;" and <br /> WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public meeting of January 22, 2020, the Planning <br /> Commission, conducted a public hearing where it considered all public testimony, agenda <br /> reports, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of City staff; and <br /> WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public meeting of January 22, 2020, the Planning <br /> Commission recommended approval of the Project to the City Council and directed staff to <br /> prepare a resolution for approval; and <br /> WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public meeting of February 12, 2020, the Planning <br /> Commission adopted a resolution recommending approval of the Project to the City Council <br /> subject to findings and conditions of approval; and <br /> WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public meeting of March 17, 2020, the City Council <br /> considered all public testimony, agenda reports, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of City <br /> staff and the Planning Commission concerning the Project; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council finds the Project inconsistent with the goals, policies, and <br /> programs of the General Plan and the goals and strategies of the Climate Action Plan. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br /> PLEASANTON DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THE FOLLOWING: <br /> SECTION 1. Findings for denial of PUD-89-06-08M <br /> With respect to the Project, PUD-89-06-08M, the City Council makes the following <br /> findings and determinations with respect to each of the considerations for a Major Modification <br /> as required by Section 18.68.110 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC): <br />