_Minutes_January 22, 2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Vice Chair Brown discussed his previous recommendation for four lots, but his decision had evolved. He requested Lot 1 be increased in size. He felt that Dale Way was an amenity and aligned with the proposed trail but suggested an increased amenity based on the extra lots. He stated he did not think the front setback needed to be increased but he could support increased setback from Dale Way which would further restrict massing. He discussed the need to protect the neighborhood since the lot would be sold. Commissioner Allen referenced the house across the street on the west side of Sycamore Road with olive trees successfully screening the home. She suggested similar screening along Dale Way and the front area to mitigate the visual impact. Ms. Clark mentioned the detention basin and possible restrictions in what could be planted. She then confirmed that the Commission had provided ample direction to staff and the applicant and the matter would come back for formal action at a future meeting. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION/INFORMATION 4. Reports from Meetings Attended (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) There were no reports from meetings attended. 5. Future Planning Calendar Ms. Denis gave a brief overview of future items for the Commission's review. 6. Actions of the City Council No action was taken. 7. Actions of the Zoning Administrator No action was taken. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS None ADJOURNMENT Vice Chair Brown adjourned the meeting at 10:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Stefanie Ananthan Recording Secretary Planning Commission Minutes Page 13 of 13 January 22, 2020 rt for five lots was not conditioned around an amenity but would prefer the proposed amenity come back to the Commission. Ms. Clark explained it was a City Council decision, but the Commission could provide input. Commissioner Allen indicated support for five lots, with increased setback from Dale Way and setback from Sycamore Road to be greater than 70 feet, a smaller building pad and a visual representing the massing of the house and which gives an actual depiction of what can be constructed on the lot. She proposed an amenity of$100,000 per extra home to be used by for bicycle and trail improvements to connect to the Sycamore area over time. Planning Commission Minutes Page 12 of 13 January 22, 2020 the visual demonstrated during the presentation. Planning Commission Minutes Page 11 of 13 January 22, 2020 Page 10 of 13 January 22, 2020 operty and referenced the size of the lots and homes near the proposed project. He then referenced the acreage between Lots 1 and 5 and discussed the applicant's willingness to move the lot line to create more or less a one-acre lot for Lot 1 but noted its impact on the creek. Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 13 January 22, 2020 mmission to approve the plan, with whatever conditions may be set forth. Harold Roundtree, neighbor of the project, provided his support of the project, with the proposed five lots. Eron Bringhurst, Pleasanton resident and member of the Bringhurst family, stated the project would look consistent with the surrounding area. Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 13 January 22, 2020 ales need to be eliminated in order to Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 11 January 15, 2020