My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
021820
>
12 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2020 2:27:54 PM
Creation date
2/13/2020 2:20:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/18/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
NOTES
TOBACCO ORDINANCE
Document Relationships
12
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\021820
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
existing retailers. Ms. Seto explained that the retailers had provided suggestions including <br /> "going dark." <br /> Commissioner Balch inquired about recreation facilities versus parks; he referenced <br /> Gingerbread Preschool and clarified it was within Amador Park. <br /> Ms. Seto clarified that the Senior Center was a recreation facility. <br /> Commissioner Balch referenced the three high schools indicating there were no retailers within <br /> 1,000-feet of the schools. He stated students traveled further to obtain tobacco products. <br /> Ms. Seto clarified that Amador High School was not within 1 ,000 feet of the Safeway on Santa <br /> Rita Road, however, Alisal Elementary School was within 1,000 feet of the Safeway. <br /> Commissioner Balch referenced Commissioner Brown's comment about "going dark" and <br /> whether the retailers were agreeable to that suggestion. Ms. Seto explained that the group <br /> discussion raised various retailers' suggestions. <br /> Commissioner Balch discussed his opinion that the Youth Commission would like change <br /> within the 1,000-foot buffer and he mentioned grandfathering existing tobacco retailers, which <br /> had been brought up by the Economic Vitality Committee and whether that was the change the <br /> Youth Commission had been seeking. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired about grandfathering regarding the buffer options and asked <br /> what other cities were doing. He also inquired about the expected change and the impact for <br /> the future. <br /> Ms. Seto stated she spoke to staff from the City of Livermore, but their changes had only been <br /> in effect for a short period, specifically since January 2020; she referenced the process of legal <br /> non-conforming uses. <br /> Commissioner Balch questioned the restrictions on a legal, non-conforming gas station. <br /> Ms. Seto explained that tobacco products could not be sold within the 1000-foot buffer. <br /> Commissioner Allen inquired as to what would happen if an existing business was sold to <br /> another property owner. <br /> Ms. Seto explained that most uses ran with the land under a conditional use permit. She stated <br /> a remodel or expansion would not allow expansion of legal, non-conforming uses. <br /> Commissioner Balch referenced the recent Shell/7-Eleven project on Hopyard Road and <br /> whether that would be an exception. <br /> Community Development Director Ellen Clark responded that project was modifying its use to <br /> include a combined gas station and convenience store, therefore, a restriction on tobacco <br /> could be imposed. <br /> Excerpt: Draft Planning Commission Minutes, January 15, 2020 Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.