My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2_Exhibits A, D & E
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
02-12
>
2_Exhibits A, D & E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 4:36:45 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 4:36:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/12/2020
Document Relationships
2
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\02-12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT D <br /> PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks/Marks Architects, Inc. for Jinglebells LLC <br /> Application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Modification to remove an existing <br /> PUD (PUD-89-6) condition of approval prohibiting a drive-through restaurant on "Pad B" within <br /> Phase III of the Rose Pavilion Shopping Center. The proposed modification would facilitate the <br /> demolition of an existing oil change facility and the construction of a new approximately 1,649- <br /> square-foot drive-through Taco Bell restaurant and related site improvements on "Pad B" <br /> located at 4210 Rosewood Drive. Zoning for the property is <br /> PUD-C (Planned Unit Development — Commercial) District. <br /> Associate Planner Eric Luchini presented the specifics of the item in the Agenda Report. <br /> Commissioner Pace requested background on the prohibition of drive-through use. <br /> Mr. Luchini stated it was unclear as to why the City Council imposed the condition. <br /> Commissioner Pace referenced the Starbucks in the Rose Pavilion shopping center and <br /> inquired about the condition and whether that was in place for the Starbucks location. <br /> Mr. Luchini responded that fast food restaurants typically had higher trip generation rates as <br /> opposed to a sit-down restaurant. He referenced the Climate Action Plan (CAP) and air quality <br /> measures and the reasons why the denial was being recommended versus what was allowed <br /> for Starbucks at the time. <br /> Commissioner Pace asked if a new CAP was in place. <br /> Mr. Luchini stated the existing CAP discussed efforts to reduce air quality impacts including <br /> walkability, but the new CAP was not complete. <br /> Vice Chair Brown asked for clarification pertaining to Starbucks and the PUD in question. <br /> Mr. Luchini confirmed that Phase 2 did not include a restriction on drive-throughs and the <br /> restriction in Phase 3 was enacted at the time of PUD creation. <br /> Commissioner Balch asked if staff recommended no new drive-throughs be permitted in town. <br /> Community Development Director Ellen Clark responded that there had not been a policy <br /> discussion as it relates to future drive-through locations in the City. <br /> Commissioner Balch discussed the zoning for the former Denny's site and the Chick-Fil-A, <br /> both located at Hopyard Road and Owens Drive, and clarified that the zoning would be <br /> straight-up zoned without its PUD. <br /> Mr. Luchini responded that Phase II of Rose Pavilion was straight zoned. <br /> Commissioner Pace questioned the rationale for why a portion of the shopping center was <br /> straight-zoned and why other phases were treated differently. <br /> Mr. Luchini stated he was not sure why the phases were different. <br /> Excerpt: Draft Planning Commission Minutes, January 22, 2020 Page 1 of 5 <br /> permitted by law, the project applicant shall <br /> hold harmless, defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), and indemnify the City, its City <br /> Council, its officers, commissions, employee and agents from and against any claim, action, or <br /> proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and/or the applicant to attack, <br /> set aside, or void the approval of the project or any permit authorized hereby for the project, <br /> including without limitation, reimbursing the City its attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense <br /> of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys <br /> of its choice. <br />te D Planning Commission <br /> 7of8 <br />Noise <br /> Patrons' voices and entertainment/music within the interior of the proposed bar would be the <br /> main noise sources generated from the subject site. The proposed hours of operation for the <br /> bar are 4 p.m. to 1 a.m., seven days a week while indoor entertainment and music would occur <br /> from 4 p.m. to midnight, seven days a week. <br /> P19-0432, 310 Main Street, Suite D Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 8 <br />