Laserfiche WebLink
outside the impact area addressed; the author has discretion as to whether they want to go <br /> beyond this level for analysis. <br /> Mr. Jarvis confirmed that City staff and ESA have both reviewed and determined there is no <br /> reason to go beyond the threshold. Exceptions might be used for industrial facilities or <br /> something that produces unusual impacts and the analysis conducted determined they were <br /> far from any thresholds. <br /> Commissioner Pace inquired why 1,000 feet is used. <br /> Mr. Jarvis confirmed this is the regulatory standard recommended by BAAQMD. <br /> Chair Allen referenced the second question as it relates to the cumulative impact which was <br /> already answered. She then referenced the third question and the data source for the pass-by <br /> assumptions related to trips generated by traffic and impact of the project. <br /> Mr. Jarvis responded this is the first time the question has been raised and they can provide <br /> more details at the City Council level. He spoke about pass-by trips, weekend versus weekday <br /> traffic and believes there is sufficient information and analysis in the record to support the <br /> EIR's conclusions. <br /> Commissioner Ritter inquired about the new analysis and confirmed with Mr. Jarvis that he did <br /> not see any genuine EIR issues and that the comments were more or less a way to slow the <br /> process of the project moving forward. <br /> Chair Allen referenced the correspondence received by Matt Sullivan and inquired about the <br /> comments and questions brought up in his letter. <br /> Mr. Jarvis stated this letter indicates the writer is not amenable with the responses that have <br /> been provided within the document. <br /> Commissioner Balch referenced that the response to the question was answered within the <br /> EIR as it relates to air quality from idling vehicles and daily delivery trucks. <br /> Chair Allen referred to Item 4 on page 1 or page 3-89, Comment 13-5 and whether the fuel <br /> delivery truck was traveling to and from the site and whether the idling on site was included in <br /> the emissions analysis. <br /> Commissioner Balch noted the response is that the analysis included both travel and idling <br /> emissions and emissions from daily delivery trips. <br /> Chair Allen then referred to the public comment received by Brian Flynn regarding <br /> formaldehyde. <br /> Mr. Jarvis responded that this public comment was restating comments made in the comment <br /> letter of August 21, 2019 and those concerns were fully addressed within the EIR. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 9 December 11, 2019 <br />asanton and the model uses those as the primary <br /> input for the assessment conducted. <br /> Chair Allen referred to the next item referenced in the correspondence as to health risk and the <br /> response that because other projects are beyond 1,000 feet from the project site, they are <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 9 December 11, 2019 <br />