My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 6-9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
020420
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 6-9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2020 4:54:39 PM
Creation date
1/28/2020 4:54:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/4/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
11
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2020\020420
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eric Luchini <br /> From: Matt Sullivan <
[email protected]
> <br /> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 2:32 PM <br /> To: Eric Luchini <br /> Cc: Mayor and City Council; Nelson Fialho; Dan Sodergren <br /> Subject: Revised Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Johnson Drive Economic <br /> Development Zone <br /> Attachments: M Sullivan - Costco Suplemental Air Quality Analysis Questions 092319.pdf <br /> Eric, <br /> Please provide a copy of this email and attachment to the Planning Commission prior to tonight's meeting. Thank you. <br /> Dear Planning Commission members, <br /> I am writing regarding your meeting tonight to consider the Revised Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report <br /> for the Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone. I submitted comments to the SEIR in August(see attached)and I <br /> believe that the response to my comments from the city is completely inadequate and does not meet the standards for <br /> good-faith disclosure and analysis required by the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Especially egregious is <br /> the city's refusal to examine cumulative impacts of nearby current and planned growth on air quality and traffic as <br /> outlined under"JDEDZ Heath Risk Assessment, No.5",of the attached. Reading others comments and the responses by <br /> the city demonstrates to me that the city is completely dismissing many valid concerns and is intent on approving this <br /> project without adequately analyzing its environment impacts. <br /> Based on the clear shortcomings of the RFSEIR I would urge you to reject its findings, not certify it,and send a <br /> recommendation to the City Council to reopen the SEIR to fully evaluate the project's environmental and health impacts <br /> on our community. <br /> Thank you <br /> Matt Sullivan <br /> Matt Sullivan <br /> cell (415)533-8164 <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.