My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3_Exhibits A & C-G
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
01-22
>
3_Exhibits A & C-G
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2020 12:23:20 PM
Creation date
1/16/2020 12:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/2020
Document Relationships
3
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\01-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Bringhurst LLC at 990 Sycamore Road <br /> Initial Study and Negative Declaration <br /> • Substantially increase light or glare in the project site or vicinity, which would <br /> adversely affect day or nighttime views. <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Impact With Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic X <br /> vista? <br /> b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, X <br /> but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and <br /> historic buildings within a state scenic highway? <br /> c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character X <br /> or quality of the site and its surroundings? <br /> d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, X <br /> which would adversely affect day or nighttime <br /> views in the area? <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> a)-b) The proposed project is not located in a hillside or ridgeline area and is not <br /> designated as a scenic resource, scenic vista, or state scenic highway. <br /> Therefore, the project would result in no impact. <br /> c) The proposed new homes would change the existing streetscape along <br /> Sycamore Creek Way and Sycamore Road. The proposed design guidelines <br /> and development standards would ensure the new homes and/or remodeled <br /> existing home are compatible with the existing neighborhoods. Separate <br /> design review approval for each new home would be required to ensure its <br /> conformance to the development standards and the design guidelines in <br /> terms of building mass and bulk, design features/details, etc. Thus, the <br /> proposed new homes would not substantially degrade the existing visual <br /> character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Therefore, the resulting <br /> impact would be less than significant. <br /> d) All exterior lighting would be required to be directed downward and designed <br /> or shielded so as to not shine onto neighboring properties or create new <br /> sources of glare. An exterior lighting plan would be required as part of the <br /> design review application submittal for each lot. The lighting plan would be <br /> required to include drawings and/or manufacturer's specification sheets <br /> 12 <br />number of mature trees on the property including native valley oak, sycamore, <br /> and California black walnut trees; these are generally located in the southern <br /> portion of the site and adjacent to the creek. Non-native trees including eucalyptus, <br /> 4 <br />at would be amenities, because a design for connection of a trail would be ready <br /> in the near term, she recommended funding be provided by the applicant to the City to be used <br /> for the highest priority projects in the bike and pedestrian master plan that deal with <br /> connectivity, especially in south Pleasanton. One in particular is the circuit bicyclists take from <br /> Sycamore to Foothill and then around Foothill. One of the key provisions is for a wider bike <br /> lane on Foothill so there is a logical connection to improving bicycling along the corridor here <br /> that is realistic in the near term and money can do that. She asked that staff look at other <br /> options along those lines, and how much of a contribution was realistic based on splitting the <br /> difference of the profit a land owner would receive by having the additional two parcels. <br /> Excerpt Planning Commission Minutes, July 11, 2018 Page 9 of 11 <br />, 2018 Page 3 of 11 <br />Way, existing lots range from 15,033 sq. ft. (5769 Hanifen Way)to 20,313 sq. <br /> ft. (1008 Sycamore Creek Way). <br /> P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission <br /> 11of16 <br /> 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36. <br /> ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k <br /> 3S 94 '@ g 'via <br /> R T3 <br /> 1:5,300 <br /> 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _ <br /> January 7 2020 `( �� ""��� <br /> 0 330 660 Feet I Y <br /> I , I I <br />