3_Exhibits A & C-G - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Brown asked that the building envelope be shown, taking into account creek setbacks from the flood plain. Commissioner Allen asked that streetscape visuals of this be provided which would assist her in understanding FAR. Mr. Beaudin agreed that staff can work with the applicant to develop some massing diagrams that generally show two story structures and where the building can sit on the property relative to the street and streetscape, and Commissioner Allen asked that this include driveway configuration and where this occurs. Commissioner Brown clarified that Commission Allen wanted the trail and the logical driveway shown and options for lots 1 and 2 or just one lot in order to understand where the building envelope needs to be. Chair Nagler confirmed that staff will discuss with the applicant the issues of whether there are one or two lots, how they are configured and how the hydrology report supports a different setback. Mr. Beaudin asked if there was interest in straw polling 4 versus 5 lots tonight. He said the Commission will likely get different opinions and if not, they can continue to work with the applicant on what this will look like. It helps narrows the field in terms of the site planning work, streetscape perspective, driveway access as well as the amenity discussion. Chair Nagler said he would rather not do this and asked staff to work with the applicant to determine where there is flexibility. Commissioner Brown said he would like to see the proposal include a distinct trail from a distinct driveway that can run in parallel, be separated or a different configuration. Commissioner Allen suggested two alternative proposals be submitted. She likened this to the Carpenter's Union project and whether or not a landscape solution would work. It turned out it could work and it was a win/win, so they want a design that has an agricultural character on Sycamore and asked if other Commissioners believe this is a priority. Commissioners agreed they would like the homes to look similar to the other homes; to have a rural feel and not like the homes on the west side. Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, July 11, 2018 Page 11 of 11 m. Commissioner Allen said she would like to see a detailed visual where the exact building pads would be along Sycamore Road. In the design she would like to see inclusion of garages and ADUs which will provide her with enough information in determining one or two lots. Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, July 11, 2018 Page 10 of 11 s a result. In terms of what would be amenities, because a design for connection of a trail would be ready in the near term, she recommended funding be provided by the applicant to the City to be used for the highest priority projects in the bike and pedestrian master plan that deal with connectivity, especially in south Pleasanton. One in particular is the circuit bicyclists take from Sycamore to Foothill and then around Foothill. One of the key provisions is for a wider bike lane on Foothill so there is a logical connection to improving bicycling along the corridor here that is realistic in the near term and money can do that. She asked that staff look at other options along those lines, and how much of a contribution was realistic based on splitting the difference of the profit a land owner would receive by having the additional two parcels. Excerpt Planning Commission Minutes, July 11, 2018 Page 9 of 11 , 2018 Page 3 of 11 Way, existing lots range from 15,033 sq. ft. (5769 Hanifen Way)to 20,313 sq. ft. (1008 Sycamore Creek Way). P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission 11of16 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36. ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k 3S 94 '@ g 'via R T3 1:5,300 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _ January 7 2020 `( �� ""�� 0 330 660 Feet I Y I , I I