3_Exhibits A & C-G - Laserfiche WebLink

is important, suggested inclusion into their HOA is an area of opportunity and looks forward to more dialogue. Mr. McDonald voiced his support of being included in the HOA at Sycamore Heights. Commissioner Ritter asked if the City's guidelines have ever overridden the HOA design guidelines. Mr. Beaudin stated the City typically approves HOA guidelines and then the HOA can modify them over time. If it is a significant departure and it was attached to a PUD it would return to the City for review and approval. Commissioner Brown asked if HOA guidelines can be tied to a different PUD, and asked what the process is. Ms. Seto stated if the Commission is asking about design guidelines, this would be one element. The architectural board can review the project but there are items such as maintenance fees and other issues so there are several elements to consider such as annexing them into the HOA. Also, because the Sycamore Heights HOA is not an actual applicant before the City at this time, the City could not compel the HOA to accept the additional properties. Commissioner Brown asked and confirmed with Ms. Seto that the scope of the Planning Commission is such that the PUD can be tied to the 'as is' design guidelines or those for Sycamore Heights, but they could not require the existing HOA annex in the other homes. Mr. McDonald clarified that their proposal is to use the Sycamore Heights design guidelines. Commissioner Allen asked if the Commission could ask that that negotiations regarding inclusion into the HOA be dealt with prior to returning with a formal application. She voiced concerns about the trail and its maintenance and voiced interest in having a closer tie-in to the HOA. Ms. Seto said the Commission could ask that the applicant hold this discussion with the association; however, it would be subject to their membership's vote. Chair Nagler stated as a condition of approval, the Commission could require maintenance of the trail, however that is ultimately done. If Lots 3, 4 and 5 have the look and feel of the neighborhood he asked why the applicant was seeking a n FAR which is substantially higher than the homes in the area. Mr. McDonald noted that they were in agreement with staff's recommendations on FAR. Commissioner Allen referred to Sycamore Road and the two parcels proposed there. She noticed when riding her bike that there is development west of the parcel that appear to be smaller lot sizes. The feel of that area is not rural and has no agriculture around them. In contrast, when moving to the other side towards Spotorno and Callippe Golf Course, there is a very agricultural feel to all parcels along Sycamore, and this project is right at the hub. She asked for background on these parcels as to when they were built. Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, July 11, 2018 Page 4 of 11 tree introduced her husband, Harold Roundtree and said they both support the proposal. She described access for the homes on lots 3, 4 and 5 as being on the Sycamore Creek Way side and said the entrance to their home is across the street from that between lots 3 and 4. She asked that the Commission request the applicant match the architecture aesthetics with their project to the Sycamore Heights neighborhood. Harold Roundtree said he serves on the Sycamore Heights HOA Board and while he is not representing the Board, the owners met with them to present their plan. He thinks consistency Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, July 11, 2018 Page 3 of 11 Way, existing lots range from 15,033 sq. ft. (5769 Hanifen Way)to 20,313 sq. ft. (1008 Sycamore Creek Way). P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission 11of16 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36. ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k 3S 94 '@ g 'via R T3 1:5,300 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _ January 7 2020 `( �� ""�� 0 330 660 Feet I Y I , I I