3_Exhibits A & C-G - Laserfiche WebLink

Table 4: PUD-A Lots 1 and 2, Comparison of Required and Proposed Standards Required Proposed Lot 1 Lot 2 Setbacks (min.) Primary Structure: Front 30' 30' 13' Side (one side/combined 5'/50' 5'/40' 5'/50' side) Rear 30' 30" 30' Class 1 Accessory Structure: Side 30' 5' 20' Rear 30' 20' 20' Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Side 5' Not proposed 5' Rear 10' 20' Height (max.) • Primary 30' 30' 30' Accessory 30' 15' 15' FAR (max.) none 27% 25% Table 5: PUD-LDR Lots 3-5: Comparison of Required and Proposed Standards Proposed Required Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 Front 25' 25' 28' 30' Side 5'/30' 5'/30' 5'/30' 5'/30' (one side/combined side) Rear 25' 25' 25' 25' Class 1 Accessory Structure: Side Not specified 3' 3' 3' Rear Not specified 5' 5' 5' Height (max.) Primary Structure 30' 30' 30' 30' Class 1 Accessory none 15' 15' 15' Structure FAR (max.) none 40% 40% 40% Height and Setbacks: As proposed, development standards for all lots would meet the NSSP setback and height requirements for primary structures. The applicant did not propose development standards for ADU and accessory structures for all of the lots. These standards P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission 12 of 16 with the intent and mapping of the NSSP. While the deviation from the standard is not substantial, staff would recommend that proposed lot lines be adjusted so that all of the lots are at least 15,000 square feet in size. For the PUD-A lots (Lots 1 and 2), per the NSSP, a minimum one-acre lot size is required. As proposed, Lot 1 would be less than one acre in size (33,602 square feet, or 0.77 acres) and Lot 2 would be 65,074 square feet, just under 1.5 acres in size. In the previous preliminary application, staff had recommended that the lot lines be configured to include the entire creek on one or other of the two properties so as to clearly assign responsibility for ownership and maintenance of the creek. As proposed, the entire creek would be located on Lot 2, the parcel with the existing residence. Staff believes there is merit to retaining clear ownership of the creek, and thus potentially to provide some flexibility (consistent with the intent of the PUD process) in the lot configuration; however, the Planning Commission should consider this in light of the entire proposal. Since the NSSP requires a minimum one-acre lot size, it would also be necessary to amend the Specific Plan to allow for this deviation. Other Development Standards Tables 4 and 5 provide a comparison of the proposed project to standards of the NSSP for the PUD-A lots, and PUD-LDR lots, respectively. The NSSP provides general site, yard, height and setback requirements for development in the PUD-LDR land use, and for the PUD-A district, references the PMC Agricultural (A) Zoning District. 3 Existing lots in the Sycamore Heights development on the south side of Sycamore Creek Way vary from 12,975 sq. ft. (941 Sycamore Creek Way) to 19,237 sq. ft. (1071 Sycamore Creek Way). Across from the project site on the north side of Sycamore Creek Way, existing lots range from 15,033 sq. ft. (5769 Hanifen Way)to 20,313 sq. ft. (1008 Sycamore Creek Way). P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission 11of16 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36. ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k 3S 94 '@ g 'via R T3 1:5,300 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _ January 7 2020 `( �� ""�� 0 330 660 Feet I Y I , I I