My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
01-22
>
2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2020 1:14:45 PM
Creation date
1/16/2020 11:54:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/2020
Document Relationships
2_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\01-22
2_Exhibits A & C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\01-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a <br /> 1 ,000-foot radius of the subject parcel and published in the newspaper. At the time this report <br /> was published, staff has not received any public comments. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> This proposal is simply consideration for removing the condition of approval prohibiting a <br /> drive-through restaurant use on "Pad B." Any such proposal would be subject to separate <br /> discretionary review by the City, through consideration of a Conditional Use Permit. Since no <br /> development would be considered with this proposal, no environmental document <br /> accompanies this report. <br /> SUMMARY/CONCLUSION <br /> Staff believes the proposal to remove the condition of approval prohibiting a drive-through <br /> restaurant on "Pad B" is inconsistent with the goals, policies, and programs of the General <br /> Plan and the goals and strategies of the CAP. These inconsistencies include greater potential <br /> to create adverse Air Quality impacts due to the drive-through component of the proposed <br /> restaurant, which fails to meet the stated goals of the General Plan and CAP; as well as being <br /> inconsistent with goals to promote a pedestrian-oriented environment to encourage walking <br /> and bicycling. In summary, the drive-through component of the proposed restaurant would <br /> potentially increase vehicular trips and VMT, thereby reducing the number of customers <br /> walking or bicycling to "Pad B" and increasing fuel consumption from those trips and/or from <br /> idling vehicles waiting in the drive-through queue. On this basis, staff recommends the <br /> Planning Commission recommend denial of the proposal to the City Council. <br /> Primary Author: Eric Luchini, Associate Planner, 925-931-5612 or eluchini(a cityofpleasantonca.gov. <br /> Reviewed/Approved By: <br /> Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager <br /> Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development <br /> PUD-89-06-08M, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Commission <br /> 15 of 15 <br />NATIVES <br /> As noted, staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend denial of the application to <br /> remove an existing condition of approval prohibiting a drive-through restaurant on "Pad B." As <br /> outlined in the findings in Exhibit A, staff believes the requested PUD Modification would be <br /> inconsistent with a number of General Plan goals and policies, and CAP strategies. <br /> Alternatively, the Planning Commission could: <br /> 1. Recommend the City Council approve the proposal to remove the condition of approval <br /> and permit a drive-through restaurant on "Pad B" subject to approval of a Conditional <br /> Use Permit and Design Review. <br /> Should the Planning Commission support this alternative, staff would recommend the Planning <br /> Commission continue the public hearing, with direction to staff to return with an amended <br /> Resolution incorporating findings in support of the proposal based on the Planning <br /> Commission's input and direction, for final review and action. <br /> PUD-89-06-08M, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Commission <br /> 14 of 15 <br />proposed <br /> restaurant, additional consideration should be shown to provide high quality design for <br /> this prominent elevation that would be highly visible. <br /> 2 A-weighted decibels are an expression of the relative loudness of sounds in air as perceived by the human ear. <br /> 3 The day-night average sound level is the average noise level over a 24-hour period. <br /> PUD-89-06-08M, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Commission <br /> 13 of 15 <br />sign revisions and/or conditions of approval. Some potential <br /> examples include: <br /> • The ordering speaker shall not be audible above the ambient noise levels beyond the <br /> property boundaries; and <br /> PUD-89-06-08M, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Commission <br /> 12 of 15 <br /> 2 of 15 <br />