My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
012120
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 5:38:54 PM
Creation date
1/15/2020 5:38:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/21/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Compare Versions Page 11 of 22 <br /> agency adopts an ordinance that eliminates zoning designations permissive to residential use or decreases <br /> residential zoning development capacity within an existing zoning district in which the development is located <br /> than what was authorized on July 1, 2019, then that development shall be deemed to be consistent with any <br /> applicable requirement of this section and Section 65913.6 if it complies with zoning designations not in conflict <br /> with this section and Section 65913.6 that were authorized as of July 1, 2019. <br /> (B)For purposes of this paragraph, "objective zoning standards"and"objective design review standards"means <br /> standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by <br /> reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development <br /> proponent and the public official before the development proponent submits an application pursuant to this <br /> section. These standards include, but are not limited to, height, setbacks, floor area ratio, and lot coverage. For <br /> purposes of this section and Section 65913.6, "objective zoning standard"does not include any limits related to <br /> residential density that would limit a development to fewer than four residential units per parcel. <br /> (3)A local agency may require the neighborhood multifamily project to provide at least 0.5 parking spaces per <br /> unit. <br /> (e)"Vacant land"means either of the following: <br /> (1)A property that contains no existing structures. <br /> (2)A property that contains at least one existing structure, but the structure or structures have been unoccupied <br /> for at least five years and are considered substandard as defined by Section 17920.3 of the Health and Safety <br /> Code. <br /> SEC.3.Section 65913.6 is added to the Government Code,to read: <br /> 65913.6.(a) For purposes of this section,the definitions provided in Section 65913.5 shall apply. <br /> (b) Except as provided in subdivision (g), a development proponent of a neighborhood multifamily project on an <br /> eligible parcel may submit an application for a development to be subject to a streamlined, ministerial approval <br /> process provided by this section and not be subject to a conditional use permit if the development meets the <br /> requirements of this section and Section 65913.5. <br /> (c) (1) If a local agency determines that a development submitted pursuant to this section is in conflict with any <br /> of the requirements specified in this section or Section 65913.5, it shall provide the development proponent <br /> written documentation of which requirement or requirements the development conflicts with, and an explanation <br /> for the reason or reasons the development conflicts with that requirement or requirements, within 60 days of <br /> submission of the development to the local agency pursuant to this section. <br /> (2) If the local agency fails to provide the required documentation pursuant to paragraph (1), the development <br /> shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of this section and Section 65913.5. <br /> (d)Any design review or public oversight of the development may be conducted by the local agency's planning <br /> commission or any equivalent board or commission responsible for review and approval of development projects, <br /> or the city council or board of supervisors, as appropriate. That design review or public oversight shall be <br /> objective and be strictly focused on assessing compliance with criteria required for streamlined projects, as well <br /> as any reasonable objective design standards published and adopted by ordinance or resolution by a local agency <br /> before submission of a development application, and shall be broadly applicable to development within the local <br /> agency. That design review or public oversight shall be completed within 90 days of submission of the <br /> development to the local agency pursuant to this section and shall not in any way inhibit, chill, or preclude the <br /> ministerial approval provided by this section or its effect,as applicable. <br /> (e) Notwithstanding any other law, a local agency, whether or not it has adopted an ordinance governing <br /> automobile parking requirements in multifamily developments, shall not impose automobile parking standards for <br /> a streamlined development that was approved pursuant to this section, including those related to orientation or <br /> structure of off-street automobile parking, beyond those provided in the minimum requirements of Section <br /> 65913.5. <br /> (f) (1) If a local agency approves a development pursuant to this section,that approval shall automatically expire <br /> after three years except that a project may receive a one-time, one-year extension if the project proponent <br /> provides documentation that there has been significant progress toward getting the development construction <br /> ready. For purposes of this paragraph,"significant progress"includes filing a building permit application. <br /> https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/bill Vers ionsCompareC1ient.xhtml?bill id=2019202... 1/10/2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.