PC-99-74 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. PC-99-74 RESOLUTION FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN SUMMERHILL HOMES AND THE CITY OF PLEASANTON IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN OR THE HAPPY VALLEY SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, SummerHill Homes has proposed a development agreement in conjunction with an application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan approval to allow the subdivision of an existing 158.4:t acre site into 79 lots ranging in size from approximately 7,500 square feet to over one and one-half acres in size on the Spotorno Ranch site which is approximately 158 acres located in the Happy Valley Specific Plan area; and WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD-SRDR/MDR/AG/OS (Planned Unit Development - Semi Rural Density ResidentialIMedium Density Residential/Agricultural/Open Space) District; and WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of October 13, 1999 the Planning Commission considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the City staff concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the project is covered by the Environmental Impact Report prepared and certified for the Happy Valley Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed PUD development plan was not consistent with the Happy Valley Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed development agreement between SummerHill Homes and the City of Pleasanton is not consistent with the Happy Valley Specific Plan and the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: Section I. Finds that the proposed development agreement between SummerHill Homes and the City of Pleasanton for the proposed SummerHill project (PUD-99-04) within the Happy Valley Specific Plan area is not consistent with the Happy Valley Specific Plan and the General Plan.