Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 3 <br /> THE CITY OF Planning Commission <br /> —� ,,,,,F Agenda Report <br /> -,, 111 1 111 2121 I 1 11 <br /> LEASANTONC November 13, 2019 <br /> Item 4 <br /> SUBJECT: P19-0342 <br /> APPLICANT: City of Pleasanton <br /> PURPOSE: Consider adding a new Section 18.140.030 Fines and Restrictions <br /> on Future Development for Illegal Historic Building Demolition to <br /> the Municipal Code to strengthen preservation of historic buildings <br /> and penalize unpermitted demolitions and alterations <br /> LOCATION: Citywide <br /> GENERAL PLAN/ <br /> SPECIFIC PLAN Various <br /> ZONING: <br /> EXHIBITS: A. Draft resolution recommending new Municipal Code Section <br /> 18.140.030 Fines and Restrictions on Future Development <br /> for Illegal Historic Building Demolition as Attachment 1 <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: <br /> 1. Find that the proposed addition to the Pleasanton Municipal Code is categorically <br /> exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). <br /> 2. Adopt a resolution recommending approval of Case P19-0342, addition to the <br /> Pleasanton Municipal Code of new Section 18.140.030 Fines and Restrictions on <br /> Future Development for Illegal Historic Building Demolition as shown in Exhibit A, <br /> Attachment 1, and forward the proposal to the City Council for consideration. <br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> Historic buildings are a community resource, and the City lists historic resources in the General <br /> Plan, has an inventory of historic residential structures in the Downtown Specific Plan area, <br /> and has determined other structures to be historic resources in other City documents. The <br /> current Municipal Code allows property owners to process new development applications that <br /> may simultaneously consider alteration and demolition of historic buildings. The Building Code <br /> also allows the Chief Building and Safety Official to make a determination if a building is so <br /> unsafe or dangerous that it should be demolished. A new section is proposed which would <br /> further the policy of preservation of historic buildings by imposing monetary fines and <br />