My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092519
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
PC 092519
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2019 2:44:17 PM
Creation date
10/30/2019 2:44:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/25/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
building would not be that large because they would have to park it. In her estimation they <br /> would likely end up with a building about the size proposed, at 9,000 or 10,000 square feet. <br /> This building would have to go through a design review process but a number of uses being <br /> proposed are permitted as of right. The City would have the ability to look at things like parking <br /> and to some degree, traffic, in the analysis. However, a future project might not be something <br /> the City could completely say "no" to for a use permitted by right in that zoning district. <br /> To Commissioner Brown's question, she thinks one thing to bear in mind is that the traffic <br /> analysis was conservative. It looked at a very aggressive trip generation as to fast-food and <br /> with more square footage. In that respect there are more "checks" in this PUD than there might <br /> otherwise be in a use permitted as of right in this district. <br /> Commissioner Balch said the problem he has is that Denny's is closed so currently there are <br /> zero trips being generated. It is a terrible intersection and section of town as it relates to traffic, <br /> given there is currently no traffic generated from this parcel. So, it is just unfortunate as to the <br /> timing of when this applicant came before the Planning Commission, but he thinks at least <br /> from the prior one, they are getting building setbacks pretty close to straight up zoning in <br /> addition to an attractive building compared to the initial version. The parking is in the rear, not <br /> the front, so there is the streetscape with the sidewalk in addition to funds for the traffic impact <br /> fees and the center island. However, he recognized the concern and doesn't want to minimize <br /> it. <br /> Commissioner Brown said he has no desire to limit any property rights and no desire to make <br /> someone else's successful business and traffic issues the applicant's property concerns. In <br /> terms of acting in the best interests of the public based on the projects the Commission has <br /> previously approved, the verbiage around the PUD, and what is and isn't permitted, is throwing <br /> him off. At the end of the day, he always prefers to know what he is getting rather than playing <br /> a guessing game. In any case, it is a great design, great architecture, well thought out, and <br /> ultimately, he wants good use of the property and something that gives the property owner <br /> rights to enjoy their property and profit from it. He was just trying to figure out whether or not by <br /> approving this PUD he was guaranteeing a higher trip generation than they would have if the <br /> Commission did not approve the project. <br /> Acting Community Development Director Brian Dolan said he agrees that without the PUD <br /> there is the potential to get the same square footage with more liberal uses that could generate <br /> more traffic. <br /> Commissioner Balch also recognized the blight of the previous Denny's restaurant which <br /> would go away if the project moves forward. <br /> Chair Allen recirculated the question to staff surrounding conditioning timing of the project <br /> around future traffic improvements, noting right now there are known issues. <br /> Ms. Clark responded that staff would query the relationship between this project and the <br /> existing traffic issues that are not caused by this project and whether or not there would be a <br /> nexus for a condition like that. <br /> Chair Allen likened it to adding to what is already a bad situation that just happens to exist. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 15 of 19 September 25, 2019 <br />oad and Owens Drive run independently. <br /> All westbound traffic moves, then all eastbound traffic moves. They need to separate those <br /> movements out so the left turn is activated, which is a heavier movement, and then the through <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 19 September 25, 2019 <br />was in full support of the proposed project with <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 19 September 25, 2019 <br />