PC 091119 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Pace echoed safety of the road, discouraging parking outside of the staging area for the park and to discourage parking on Dublin Canyon Road. He also agrees visuals were also important. Commissioner Brown thanked those who gave presentations and public comments. Chair Allen asked Ms. Amos to recap on the next steps and timeline. Ms. Amos referenced the slide of information showing the project timeline. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS Commissioner Ritter mentioned the Chamber of Commerce mixer event at the Pacific Pearl project and questioned signage for the entrance/exits which he commented were difficult to find. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION/INFORMATION 4. Reports from Meetings Attended (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) There were no reports from meetings attended. 5. Future Planning Calendar Ms. Clark gave a brief overview of future items for the Commission's review. 6. Actions of the City Council No action was taken. 7. Actions of the Zoning Administrator No action was taken. ADJOURNMENT Chair Allen adjourned the meeting at 8:26 p.m. Respectfully submitted, -,±jkt PACtilktirk CU/V, Stefanie Ananthan Recording Secretary Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 8 September 11, 2019 driveway and what the bridge expansion might mean at that location. Chair Allen echoed comments of both Commissioners Ritter and Balch. She referenced Dublin Canyon Road and believes the viewpoints need to be clear and include a precise montage of what is proposed. She agreed about public safety and the need to ensure this is taken into consideration. When the project comes back before the Planning Commission, she suggested a better understanding be made regarding Measures PP and QQ and the need for understanding the implication of removing two existing lots, slopes especially around the Shriner property and getting clarity about what is still left that may need to be evaluated. Lastly, although this meeting is not about alternatives, because views have become a critical issue in this project, if the Commission finds views from Dublin Canyon Road, even with the two homes removed, are still a major issue including potential Measure PP issues, one alternative should be the consideration of removing homes that would be problematic from a PP and QQ perspective, so the Commission can have that information and understand what the project would look like. Commissioner Brown asked that Ms. Amos discuss with City Traffic Engineer Mike Tassano in regard to road safety and whether there is a potential for a crossing point, for instance a flashing red pedestrian light to alert drivers that pedestrians are crossing. He also inquired about the staging area and Commissioner Balch's comments regarding the sufficiency of the staging area size and an option for a revised number of parking spaces from 16 to something greater and this viewpoint, given it has not been finalized. Ms. Clark clarified that the Commission was asking for the EIR to analyzed an increased footprint for the staging area so as not to have to re-evaluate it later on. Commissioner Brown paraphrased Commissioner Balch's comments that indicate the Commission would like to see a range for the size and spaces. Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 8 September 11, 2019 uch uses but does not see the correlation to the current violence in the media. He expressed the desire to see a limitation set around alcohol consumption during the time of play, perhaps limiting consumption to two drinks per player for the duration of play. He also Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 9 August 14, 2019