My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091119
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
PC 091119
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2019 2:12:29 PM
Creation date
10/30/2019 2:12:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/11/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
correct spelling of the family name. He explained that it is strictly used for agricultural purposes <br /> under the Williamson Act, and he spoke of his ancestry to the east of this property as the Kelly <br /> brothers who shared several ranches, and as members of the Murray Township which later <br /> became the areas presently known as Dublin and Pleasanton. Mr. Devany stated the proposed <br /> project will change this land use from agricultural to residential after 160+ years. His concern is <br /> his family rely on the Lester's property to gain access to their ranch as other access points to <br /> his property are impractical. If the project proceeds ahead without granting them access from <br /> the project to their property, they will cease agricultural activities at their ranch, and this will <br /> increase fire activities and land will lay dormant. He therefore requested the City consider <br /> these significant impacts in the EIR and believes there are potential mitigations. Without <br /> mitigation there may be potential litigation. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> Rebuttal - Applicant <br /> Rick Rosenbaum gave clarification to which bridge would be widened and said the reason to <br /> widen the bridge will accommodate the bicycle lanes and this is a significant capital <br /> expenditure, but they would like to decouple that installation from the project as far as timing, <br /> given permitting issues. They have looked at various ways and the southern side is most <br /> feasible without impacting traffic and the creek. <br /> Commissioner Balch noted this is directly southeast of the Canyon Meadows driveway area <br /> and he confirmed this was immediately east of the driveway on the Jehovah Witness property. <br /> Mr. Rosenbaum clarified that Ponderosa is proposing the addition of a right-turn lane on Dublin <br /> Canyon Road to help residents enter into the Canyon Meadows neighborhood, which does not <br /> currently exist. He explained there is an existing easement granted to the EBRPD by the <br /> Vinson family that provides public trail access across the parcel Mr. Vinson owns which is an <br /> existing gravel road. <br /> Commissioner Balch asked if the staging area would not be located within Mr. Vinson's parcel <br /> and the easement is for access to a trail. <br /> Mr. Rosenbaum confirmed the trail is meant to cross the road and access the EBRPD property <br /> through the easement. Otherwise the trail itself is entirely on the Lester property. <br /> Commissioner Pace asked for a background and whether the City has done an analysis on <br /> speed limits on Dublin Canyon Road. <br /> Ms. Amos responded that the City had recently conducted a speed study and found that a <br /> higher speed was warranted but they chose not to implement speed at the suggested level but <br /> kept the posted sign limit which is now in place. <br /> Commissioner Pace inquired about added residences and potential re-examination of existing <br /> traffic speeds. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 8 September 11, 2019 <br />mily's ownership of the property east of the EBRPD <br /> property, and noted that the spelling of "Devaney," although reflected on maps, was not the <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 8 September 11, 2019 <br />to the operator. <br /> He noted a rock-climbing wall is inherently more dangerous than bocce, so he thinks the <br /> operator has provided ways to mitigate risk sufficiently. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor echoed that he is supportive of the location for this type of activity <br /> and does not have an issue with parking. He agrees this is a more dangerous activity than <br /> other such uses but does not see the correlation to the current violence in the media. He <br /> expressed the desire to see a limitation set around alcohol consumption during the time of <br /> play, perhaps limiting consumption to two drinks per player for the duration of play. He also <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 9 August 14, 2019 <br />