My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091119
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
PC 091119
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2019 2:12:29 PM
Creation date
10/30/2019 2:12:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/11/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Ritter inquired and wanted confirmation the public comments already received <br /> will be incorporated into the talking points and FEIR. <br /> Ms. Amos confirmed. <br /> Chair Allen inquired as to visual impacts and asked for the process of identifying the locations <br /> where streetscapes or visual portrayals would be created and what they would look like. <br /> Ms. Amos confirmed the environmental document will have five viewpoints at various locations <br /> and will review other vantage points to determine visibility and will include views of before and <br /> after. <br /> Commissioner Brown stated he knows the staging area moved in this design and the <br /> Commission had conducted a straw poll in terms of where it should be, and he asked if this <br /> plan is reflective of that recommendation. <br /> Noted Present: <br /> Commissioner Pace arrived at 7:18 p.m. <br /> Ms. Amos confirmed the new location reflected was staff, the majority of the Planning <br /> Commission, and EBRPD's preferred location. <br /> Commissioner Brown said in terms of the path, Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA), and staging <br /> area, while nothing has been finalized, he asked if there were any aspects at this time in terms <br /> of design. <br /> Ms. Amos confirmed the design has not been finalized. <br /> Commissioner Brown asked at what portions of the staging area within Parcel C were subject <br /> to the living trust and at what portions would become part of the EBRPD. <br /> Ms. Clark deferred to the applicant's impending presentation for clarification on dedication and <br /> ownership. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> Applicant/Project Planning Manager Rick Rosenbaum with Ponderosa Homes gave a brief <br /> overview of the project history and a presentation. He explained some of the refinements and <br /> changes that came out of the Planning Commission work session on March 27, 2019, <br /> revisions to the staging area, reduction of lots in the project, community benefits, water system <br /> improvements and others. Reversion of the parcel to the EBRPD will be done once the Lester <br /> family is no longer living on the property. In the interim, the trail easement would be granted to <br /> the EBRPD for connection from the staging area to where they plan to provide public access. <br /> They are still refining landscape and visual concepts with the idea of having a private gated <br /> entry off of Dublin Canyon Road, with significant landscape features and he described the lot <br /> configuration and EVA point, noting the two residences owned by the Lester family will be <br /> turned into two large lots with access off of the existing road which will also serve as the <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8 September 11, 2019 <br />separation is <br /> handled with mesh and is a stronger barrier than the application had initially outlined. He <br /> stated that, for all of these reasons, it helps him think the serving of alcohol could be overcome <br /> as a concern; however, he was also open to ideas to tie the resultant activities to the operator. <br /> He noted a rock-climbing wall is inherently more dangerous than bocce, so he thinks the <br /> operator has provided ways to mitigate risk sufficiently. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor echoed that he is supportive of the location for this type of activity <br /> and does not have an issue with parking. He agrees this is a more dangerous activity than <br /> other such uses but does not see the correlation to the current violence in the media. He <br /> expressed the desire to see a limitation set around alcohol consumption during the time of <br /> play, perhaps limiting consumption to two drinks per player for the duration of play. He also <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 9 August 14, 2019 <br />