Laserfiche WebLink
vehicles that are on the road, but in this case, they are likely on Hopyard Road, not Owens <br /> Drive. Sometimes, pass-by numbers hinder the developer. For example, if a vehicle is traveling <br /> northbound on Hopyard Road and they're trying to get to a fast food location in that shopping <br /> center, instead of continuing northbound which will take them over the freeway, they must <br /> make the left turn on Owens Drive and upon exiting, they will likely make another left turn <br /> which creates more of an impact. He said staff looks at these instances and for the most part <br /> would eliminate the pass-by to avoid that confusion. <br /> Commissioner Balch stated his question was whether 25-percent was an appropriate estimate <br /> for the credit being given in the analysis or whether 50-percent was a more appropriate <br /> estimate, and he confirmed it is use-based, as referenced by Mr. Tassano. <br /> Mr. Tassano confirmed that 25-percent is the amount estimated by ITE for pass-by for a fast <br /> food restaurant and it is the standard. <br /> Commissioner Balch inquired whether retail was also in the same category. <br /> Mr. Tassano confirmed it is also 25-percent, but they are not the same use. <br /> Commissioner Balch noted it was on Table B versus A, and he confirmed that the report was <br /> paid for by the developer but was contracted through the City. Therefore, the developer <br /> doesn't get the opportunity to adjust the results. <br /> Commissioner Balch said the main concern is the Larkspur Landing driveway and to mitigate <br /> that, the applicant has found a solution to raise the median, which forces vehicles to make a <br /> right-turn both upon entrance and exit. When exiting to the right, it causes vehicles to make a <br /> U-turn at the intersection and that impact can be mitigated. <br /> Mr. Tassano said they may see an increase in the number of vehicles who decide not to use <br /> the Larkspur Landing driveway because they want to make a quick U-turn, which means they <br /> may end up in the Chick-Fil-A exiting volume. He conjectured if this takes longer or created <br /> more delay for those vehicles, they might continue to use the Larkspur Landing driveway. He <br /> said even if they took the extra U-turn volume into account, it would be minimal impact at an <br /> additional three or four vehicles. There is not a lot of delay occurring at this location because <br /> eastbound Owens Drive is relatively low and there are enough gaps. Even at build-out, the <br /> delay would be minimal to make that U-turn. Additionally, regarding Larkspur Landing, when a <br /> vehicle has to make a right-turn upon exiting potentially there is a lack of storage for queued <br /> vehicles at Owens Drive and Johnson Court. The consultant commented that modifying the <br /> signal timing could address this issue by creating better efficiency in moving vehicles through <br /> the intersection. <br /> Lastly, Mr. Tassano clarified that vehicles can still make the left-turn into the Larkspur Landing <br /> parking lot as they would make a left-turn into the Tommy T's parking lot, which is preferable <br /> by developers. He said the developers aren't as concerned with how vehicles exit, but <br /> ensuring they have easy access entering the location is of bigger concern. <br /> Commissioner Balch voiced appreciation for Mr. Tassano's explanations regarding his <br /> questions and concerns. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 19 September 25, 2019 <br />e confusing to staff and <br /> decision-makers because it results in a subtraction of trips. He clarified that pass-by means <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 19 September 25, 2019 <br /> the change being proposed, given that he thinks <br /> it would significantly impact them, as well as Tommy T's located on the other side of the street. <br /> Mr. Luchini responded that the Larkspur Landing representative he communicated with, who <br /> he believed was the hotel's General Manager, was in full support of the proposed project with <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 19 September 25, 2019 <br /> <br /> P19-0151 Planning Commission <br /> Page 8 of 12 <br />City will retain the cash <br /> deposit until all work is substantially complete, all areas are stabilized, and all hazards are <br /> mitigated to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering/City Engineer. <br /> P19-0151 Planning Commission <br /> Page 7 of 12 <br />