My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
10-23
>
2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2019 1:05:35 PM
Creation date
10/17/2019 11:49:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/23/2019
Document Relationships
2_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\10-23
2_Exhibits A & C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\10-23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table 1: Development Standards <br /> Development Standard Required Proposed <br /> Min. Setbacks No development outside of All development within <br /> DDA DDA <br /> Max. Floor Area Ratio* 42% 32.95% <br /> Max. House Size** 8,450 square feet 6,198 square feet**** <br /> Max. Height Main House*** 25 feet 24 feet <br /> Max. Driveway Width 16 feet 16 feet <br /> Min. Garage Size/On-site Parking 3 car garage + 2 on-site 3 car garage + 3 on-site <br /> guest spaces guest spaces <br /> Min. Tree Planting 20 new 24-inch box trees 20 new 24-inch box <br /> trees <br /> *The Estates on Oak Ridge Subdivision FAR is calculated by dividing the total conditioned space of each residence(including garage area <br /> exceeding 700 sq.ft.,but excluding non-habitable accessory structures,exterior balconies,stoops and steps,decks, and porches not <br /> enclosed on three sides)by area of the DDA. <br /> **Maximum allowable house size determined by size of the DDA multiplied by the maximum allowable floor area ratio(FAR). <br /> ***The height of a structure is measured vertically from the lowest finished grade adjacent to an exterior wall of a building to the highest <br /> elevation of the building,excluding chimneys and similar roof features,as permitted by City R-1-40,000 District. <br /> ****House size includes total house floor area plus any garage floor area exceeding 700 square feet. <br /> Proposed Landscape <br /> The proposed landscape plan includes a tree/plant palette of primarily drought tolerant native <br /> and non-native species, as well as some hardscape features highlighted by scored color <br /> concrete and decorative concrete paver patios in the rear yard and a decorative warm <br /> earthtone color paver motor-court area in the front yard. None of the existing trees on the <br /> parcel are proposed for removal or will be affected by the project. <br /> A photo simulation showing the outline of the proposed residence was provided which <br /> demonstrated that it would not be visible from Vineyard Avenue due to existing topography and <br /> intervening mature oak trees. Given this fact, typical photo simulations showing color 3D <br /> perspectives of the home were not required. <br /> Please see the attached project plans (Exhibit B) for additional information on the project. A <br /> color and material board will be available for review at the hearing. <br /> STAFF REVIEW/ANALYSIS <br /> In addition to the development standards for height, FAR, etc. outlined above, the Estates on <br /> Oak Ridge architectural design guidelines address the DDA/building envelope, landscaping, <br /> architectural style, and other design parameters. Below is an analysis of the subject proposal <br /> in comparison with those architectural design guidelines. <br /> P19-0151, 5 Winding Oaks Drive Planning Commission <br /> 4 of 9 <br /> ''';*-t-4,;,. <br /> ` Subject Lot Aw <br /> w <br /> e 3 <br /> P19-0151, 5 Winding Oaks Drive Planning Commission <br /> 2 of 9 <br />en it has not been finalized. <br /> Ms. Clark clarified that the Commission was asking for the EIR to analyzed an increased <br /> footprint for the staging area so as not to have to re-evaluate it later on. <br /> Commissioner Brown paraphrased Commissioner Balch's comments that indicate the <br /> Commission would like to see a range for the size and spaces. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 8 September 11, 2019 <br />