My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
10-23
>
2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2019 1:05:35 PM
Creation date
10/17/2019 11:49:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/23/2019
Document Relationships
2_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\10-23
2_Exhibits A & C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\10-23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
THE CITY OF Planning Commission <br /> ,,,_� ,,, Agenda Report <br /> ,,, :1,,; <br /> LEASANTON© October 23, 2019 <br /> Item 2 <br /> SUBJECT: P19-0151 <br /> APPLICANT: Kevin Gregory <br /> PROPERTY OWNER: Subramanian lyer, London Road, LLC <br /> PURPOSE: Application for Design Review approval to construct an <br /> approximately 5,761-square-foot, single-story residence with an <br /> approximately 1 ,137-square-foot attached garage <br /> LOCATION: 5 Winding Oaks Drive (Lot 5) <br /> GENERAL PLAN: Low Density Residential and Open Space-Public Health and Safety <br /> SPECIFIC PLAN: Vineyard Avenue Corridor <br /> ZONING: Planned Unit Development — Hillside Residential/Open Space <br /> (PUD-HR/OS) District <br /> EXHIBITS: A. Draft Resolution and Conditions of Approval <br /> B. Project Plans, View Simulation, and Color and Material <br /> Board dated "Received August 26, 2019" <br /> C. Location and Notification Map <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Design Review (DR) Case No. <br /> P19-0151 based on the Findings and subject to the draft Conditions of Approval listed in <br /> Exhibit A. <br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> The proposed project is to construct an approximately 5,761-square-foot, single-story <br /> residence with an approximately 1 ,137-square-foot attached garage on an approximately <br /> 3.35-acre lot within the Estates on Oak Ridge Subdivision. New homes within the subdivision <br /> require the Planning Commission to review and consider a design review application. As such, <br /> this Design Review application is before the Planning Commission for consideration. As <br /> proposed and conditioned, staff recommends that the Planning Commission find the project to <br /> be consistent with the applicable regulations and approve the application. <br />tion of removing two existing lots, slopes especially around the <br /> Shriner property and getting clarity about what is still left that may need to be evaluated. <br /> Lastly, although this meeting is not about alternatives, because views have become a critical <br /> issue in this project, if the Commission finds views from Dublin Canyon Road, even with the <br /> two homes removed, are still a major issue including potential Measure PP issues, one <br /> alternative should be the consideration of removing homes that would be problematic from a <br /> PP and QQ perspective, so the Commission can have that information and understand what <br /> the project would look like. <br /> Commissioner Brown asked that Ms. Amos discuss with City Traffic Engineer Mike Tassano in <br /> regard to road safety and whether there is a potential for a crossing point, for instance a <br /> flashing red pedestrian light to alert drivers that pedestrians are crossing. He also inquired <br /> about the staging area and Commissioner Balch's comments regarding the sufficiency of the <br /> staging area size and an option for a revised number of parking spaces from 16 to something <br /> greater and this viewpoint, given it has not been finalized. <br /> Ms. Clark clarified that the Commission was asking for the EIR to analyzed an increased <br /> footprint for the staging area so as not to have to re-evaluate it later on. <br /> Commissioner Brown paraphrased Commissioner Balch's comments that indicate the <br /> Commission would like to see a range for the size and spaces. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 8 September 11, 2019 <br />