Laserfiche WebLink
THE CITY OF Planning Commission <br /> ,,,_� ,,, Agenda Report <br /> ,,, :1,,; <br /> LEASANTON© October 23, 2019 <br /> Item 2 <br /> SUBJECT: P19-0151 <br /> APPLICANT: Kevin Gregory <br /> PROPERTY OWNER: Subramanian lyer, London Road, LLC <br /> PURPOSE: Application for Design Review approval to construct an <br /> approximately 5,761-square-foot, single-story residence with an <br /> approximately 1 ,137-square-foot attached garage <br /> LOCATION: 5 Winding Oaks Drive (Lot 5) <br /> GENERAL PLAN: Low Density Residential and Open Space-Public Health and Safety <br /> SPECIFIC PLAN: Vineyard Avenue Corridor <br /> ZONING: Planned Unit Development — Hillside Residential/Open Space <br /> (PUD-HR/OS) District <br /> EXHIBITS: A. Draft Resolution and Conditions of Approval <br /> B. Project Plans, View Simulation, and Color and Material <br /> Board dated "Received August 26, 2019" <br /> C. Location and Notification Map <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Design Review (DR) Case No. <br /> P19-0151 based on the Findings and subject to the draft Conditions of Approval listed in <br /> Exhibit A. <br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> The proposed project is to construct an approximately 5,761-square-foot, single-story <br /> residence with an approximately 1 ,137-square-foot attached garage on an approximately <br /> 3.35-acre lot within the Estates on Oak Ridge Subdivision. New homes within the subdivision <br /> require the Planning Commission to review and consider a design review application. As such, <br /> this Design Review application is before the Planning Commission for consideration. As <br /> proposed and conditioned, staff recommends that the Planning Commission find the project to <br /> be consistent with the applicable regulations and approve the application. <br />tion of removing two existing lots, slopes especially around the <br /> Shriner property and getting clarity about what is still left that may need to be evaluated. <br /> Lastly, although this meeting is not about alternatives, because views have become a critical <br /> issue in this project, if the Commission finds views from Dublin Canyon Road, even with the <br /> two homes removed, are still a major issue including potential Measure PP issues, one <br /> alternative should be the consideration of removing homes that would be problematic from a <br /> PP and QQ perspective, so the Commission can have that information and understand what <br /> the project would look like. <br /> Commissioner Brown asked that Ms. Amos discuss with City Traffic Engineer Mike Tassano in <br /> regard to road safety and whether there is a potential for a crossing point, for instance a <br /> flashing red pedestrian light to alert drivers that pedestrians are crossing. He also inquired <br /> about the staging area and Commissioner Balch's comments regarding the sufficiency of the <br /> staging area size and an option for a revised number of parking spaces from 16 to something <br /> greater and this viewpoint, given it has not been finalized. <br /> Ms. Clark clarified that the Commission was asking for the EIR to analyzed an increased <br /> footprint for the staging area so as not to have to re-evaluate it later on. <br /> Commissioner Brown paraphrased Commissioner Balch's comments that indicate the <br /> Commission would like to see a range for the size and spaces. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 8 September 11, 2019 <br />